|
by Michael Erskine
TORONTO---Last
year was a banner year for the improv career of Ron Kelly (son of
Linda Kelly, of Sheguiandah), but nothing prepared him for the
excitement of winning the prestigious Globehead Award on the Bad Dog
Theatre stage.
Mr. Kelly can
legitimately claim top banana status in the Manitoulin Island improv
lineup this year as well, as in order to claim the gold-plated Million
Dollar Man statuette he had to beat a combination of the two favourite
improv teams that included that very talented Manitoulin alumnus,
Herbie Barnes, grandson of Aundeck Omni Kaning's Corella Corbiere.
"Herbie's team is
called 'Tonto's Nephews;' they are a First Nation troupe with members
from reserves all across the province," explained Mr. Kelly. "They
were the second favourites, just behind Improvimatrixx."
Improvimatrixx,
explained Mr. Kelly, was the nom de guerre for the improv sensation,
Slap Happy, a group that routinely shares stage space internationally
with the top improv players from Mad TV and Second City.
"They showed up
dressed in leather," recalled Mr. Kelly. "The Globehead Tournament
tends to be a little schticky. They just did it because they thought
it would be funny, and it was."
The Globehead
Tournament has begun to garner a great deal of prestige and the 16
teams invited to compete now represent some of the best comedic
performers in the country.
"The Second City
guys tend to show up and most of the mainstage people from
TheatreSport are in it as well," said Mr. Kelly. "It is really
becoming quite an event."
Mr. Kelly's group,
with the relatively staid moniker 'Sup Sup and the A'rights,' won
their own division and waited to see which of the two top ranked
groups they would be meeting in the finals.
"It was a tie, so to
break it they turned up the house lights and started counting hands,"
he said. "Then one of the guys from Improvimatrixx suggested they form
a single team, as both groups were short-handed. The crowd went wild
with the idea."
Although the
referees were uncertain about the legality of the plan under the
rules, the Sup Sup and the A'rights team ran out onstage and endorsed
the plan, making it a lock.
When the dust had
settled and the last improv skit was complete, Mr. Kelly's team was
the crowd favourite.
Mr. Kelly is now on
the mainstage of TheatreSport, the only portion of what is now known
as Bad Dog Theatre Company for artistic and licensing reasons, and his
presence there is even more of an accomplishment, in his mind, than
the winning of the Globehead.
"I am clearly the
rookie onstage," he laughed. "I am the only member of the cast with
less than 10 years' experience."
But he is quite
happy with his junior status, pointing out that it is the best way to
learn your craft.
"I was in a band for
many years," he said. "They say that you should always try to be the
worst member in your band; the best way to advance is if you are
surrounded by better players."
Mr. Kelly can be
seen on stage pretty much every Saturday at 8 pm, when the mainstage
production takes to the bright lights, but great improv can be seen at
Bad Dog Theatre Company's converted Caldwell Banker offices nearly
ever day of the week, as students take their turn in the spotlight.
He has also been
involved in his own stage production, Creepmare on Nightstreet, which
as the name clearly indicates is a sendup of nearly every horror movie
clichZ.
Like many aspiring
artists, while he pursues his first love in the glare of the
footlights, Mr. Kelly works in a 'day job' at a sales agency office.
He will be returning
to school full-time next year to complete a BA in Theatre and English
he has been working on part-time. |
|
by Jim Moodie
MANITOULIN--Farmers are, almost by definition, problem-solvers,
accustomed to dealing daily with a wide range of challenges.
Haying, calving, milking, these are just the most obvious things
that farmers do--they also fix equipment, calculate feed
requirements, manage their books, cut and mill wood, maintain
buildings and fences, the list goes on. They're factotums,
farmers, and when there's a problem, they simply roll up their
sleeves--or sharpen their pencils--and get to it.
What's so
frustrating about the current beef crisis to such folks is that,
in many ways, it's out of their hands. The trade ban with the US
remains the biggest threat to their livelihoods, yet there isn't
much a farmer can individually do to get the border reopened.
That's a task for the politicians. As Western Manitoulin cattle
farmer Jeff Heitkamp notes, "I think diplomacy is the only way
at this point to get the markets reopened."
That said,
farmers aren't just sitting around wringing their hands and
waiting for the trade ban to lift. In the meantime, they're
putting their heads together to find interim methods to
alleviate the problem, and to develop strategies that will make
Canada
less dependent on the US in the long run. "Hopefully there are
lessons to be learned from this," says Tehkummah dairy farmer
Jim Anstice. "It's been a big mistake, for instance, for Canada
to have every cow slaughtered in the States."
The provincial
government seems to have recognized that there has been an
over-reliance on US slaughterhouses and packing facilities,
recently announcing $10 million in funding "to support a new
cull-animal strategy, and to provide new markets for Canadian
beef in the wake of the closing of the US border to Canadian
livestock," according to a press release. Jim Martin, Northern
Ontario representative for the Ontario Cattlemen's Association (OCA),
says that a good chunk of that money is being committed to the
creation of a new slaughterhouse in Kitchener. "There used to be
the MGI plant there, which closed four or five years ago. This
new one is called Gencore Foods," he explains.
The province
also pledged $7 million to beef farmers to "ease the transition
to a new generation of farm safety nets," promised to establish
a national beef "strike force" to rebuild international
confidence in Canadian beef, and said it is committed to having
118 full and part-time meat inspectors in place by April 1. Mr.
Martin welcomes these moves, although he notes that it won't
result in immediate relief for farmers. "Certainly it's a help,
for the long-term, but it doesn't mean money in farmer's pockets
right now. As far as immediate aid goes, it's not going to help
much."
The federal
government is also expected to announce an aid package in the
coming weeks. "There have been some strong hints, and we believe
there will be something coming," says Mr. Martin.
One of the
disaster relief measures that the OCA has called for in a
statement released this month is a loan guarantee for cattle
producers that would be "interest free for up to one year or for
60 days following the opening of the
US
market for live cattle (whichever is the shorter time period)."
Additionally, the OCA is advocating, as a form of disaster
assistance, a direct cash payment to farmers of $150 per head of
cattle (excepting bred and milking cows, as well as breeding
bulls). Whether the federal government goes that far remains to
be seen.
Meanwhile,
local farmers are still stuck with burgeoning herds, and have
precious few options for selling their cattle, particularly the
older cull cows. Prices are rock bottom, and the nearest
abattoirs are in Sturgeon Falls and Bruce Mines, a three hour,
and three-and-a-half hour, drive, respectively.
With prices
the way they are, it hardly pays to transport a cow to such
facilities--a reality that has only underlined the need for a
slaughterhouse on Manitoulin. As Mr. Anstice notes, "had there
been an abattoir here when this crisis occurred, we might not
have made a lot of money, but we would have made more than
selling straight to stockyards. And we could cover some of the
hamburger market locally."
Manitoulin has
not had a slaughterhouse since the one in Spring Bay closed
several years ago, but this could change soon. Richard Williams,
a resident of M'Chigeeng First Nation, has acquired all the
permits necessary for the construction of a new abattoir and
butcher shop, and says he "is just waiting for the snow to melt
so we can start building."
If all goes
according to plan and Mother Nature cooperates, the new facility
could be processing beef as early as September, he says. Mr.
Williams has worked as a meat inspector, both provincially and
federally, and says that all the meat will be properly inspected
and graded, suitable for selling in Island stores.
While
Manitoulin produces more beef than can be consumed locally, a
local abattoir will certainly provide a handy and useful option
for Island farmers. "It wouldn't eliminate the beef crisis, but
it would sure help," says Mr. Heitkamp. Consumers might
appreciate the option of buying local beef as well, whether it's
directly from Mr. Williams, or the farmer, or perhaps in one of
the local grocery stores.
Mr. Heitkamp
says that the Co-Op Valumart in Gore Bay has expressed a
willingness to stock local beef, provided it has passed all
necessary inspections, and the Foodland in Mindemoya is also
agreeable, according to Mr. Williams. "They are supplied through
Sobey's, and have to get a certain amount through them, but I
talked to Sam Bondi, and he said they could handle some
Manitoulin beef."
At present,
most of the younger cattle on Manitoulin are being sent to
southern Ontario feedlots to get fattened up for slaughter, but
Mr. Williams believes that a local abattoir would encourage
farmers to hold onto some of their prime beef, and have it
processed here. Presumably, a year from now one will be able to
buy not only Manitoulin hamburger, but Manitoulin steak, in a
local store, and if marked as such, might inspire some patriotic
purchasing. Mr. Heitkamp notes that the LaCloche Manitoulin
Business Assistance Corporation (LAMBAC) has developed a "Made
on Manitoulin" marketing logo which "would be perfect for that."
But even if
Mr. Williams is successful in getting his slaughtering and
butchering business off the ground, challenges remain for local
cattle and dairy farmers. The closure of the main export
markets--the US, primarily, but also Japan and Korea--has
resulted in a glut of beef domestically, and to get things
moving again will probably take either a significant new
international market or, perhaps, a drastic measure--namely a
mass cull of the older cows that might have been exposed to
Bovine Spongiform Encephalitis (BSE) through the contaminated
feed outlawed in 1997.
Developing a
new international market is neither easy nor quick, says Mr.
Martin. He's skeptical that a European country, for instance,
will suddenly present a solution to our stockpile of beef. "They
subsidize their farmers so much that, even with our depressed
prices, we probably can't compete." Many European nations are
also highly paranoid about BSE, and could demand that every
carcass is subjected to a lab test before it is allowed in the
country, as
Japan
is currently doing.
Canada could
conceivably begin testing every cow for BSE, but Mr. Martin says
that it's not only unnecessary--the head of the Canadian Food
Inspection Agency himself has argued that eliminating the spine
and brain is a far better, safer course of action, according to
the farmer--but it's also impractical and uneconomical. "We
don't have the facilities right now to test every cow--it would
be 16 months before we could get up to speed for that."
Plus it would
be costly. "To test every one would cost $30 to $50 per animal,"
Mr. Martin says. And given that Japan "only buys one cut out of
the carcass, albeit a premium one (strip loins), it's not really
worth it to us to try to satisfy that one market. We couldn't
compete with Australia."
Both Canada
and the US are looking into increased testing of cows for BSE,
but neither country feels it is necessary or feasible to test
every cow.
An alternative
is to euthanize all the cows that are old enough to have been
possibly infected by cross-contaminant feed (understood to be
the cause of BSE). But Mr. Martin says that the industry is
leery of doing this, as animal rights activists will surely
raise a fuss, and consumers might get queasy as a result. He
also says that it would be difficult for farmers, who "put a lot
of pride into breeding their herds over the years." Euthanizing
older cows would "likely represent a complete loss" financially,
but it would also be "heartbreaking" on an emotional level, he
says.
Some farmers,
however, feel this might be the only way out of the problem, as
difficult as it would be on both a financial and emotional
level. "If that (a mass cull) is what it takes to get get
markets open and things moving, it might be what we have to do,"
says Mr. Heitkamp. He believes that rather than turn consumers
off of beef, such a strategy would actually "add confidence,
because we're taking steps to (eliminate health risks)." He
admits that it would be a financial hit for farmers, "but look
at the hit we're taking now," he reasons. "If this is what will
take to cure the industry, it's worth it."
Other ways out
of the crisis have been bandied about. Howland farmer Ken
Ferguson has one of the more novel suggestions. "I think one way
to get out of this slump might be to give away a few boatloads
of beef," either as foreign aid to developing countries, or to a
country like Japan that is banning North American beef products
at present, but might consider relaxing their ban when
confronted with a gift.
Mr. Ferguson
says that when Britain experienced its mad cow crisis, meat was
"put in the freezer for 10 years." This is an option for
Canadian beef producers as well, but hardly an ideal (or
palatable) one.
Supplying
developing countries with beef is an idea worth considering,
says Mr. Martin, but he doesn't believe it is very promising.
"The problem there is that they don't have the refrigeration for
the storage of beef, and they're not used to it in their diet.
It might help somewhat (to explore this market), but I don't
know how much."
While all of
these interim and partial solutions are worth investigating, a
complete revival of the beef industry pends the reopening of the
major export markets.
No-one really
knows how long this will take. But Mr. Martin has more
confidence in the new players on the federal scene to resolve
the crisis than he did in their predecessors. "I can say that
the new Minister of Agriculture (Bob Speller) has spent more
time on this than the previous minister. And he's kept us up to
date, sharing the minutes of meetings he's had with his
counterparts in the US and Asia, whereas before we were pretty
much in the dark. Our present government is working a lot harder
on this."
The ball,
unfortunately, seems to be in the court of the US. But if our
federal representatives are working as hard as the average
Canadian farmer does on the problems they encounter daily on
their farms, maybe there's an end in sight to this crisis. |