|
Social Service board
takes ambulance service in-house
|
by Michael Erskine
ESPANOLA---Ambulance services will be provided by the
Manitoulin-Sudbury District Social Services Administration Board
'in-house' in 2004, as the board decided to take over the
administration from the private contractors who currently deliver the
service.
Attitudes expressed by members of the Manitoulin-Sudbury District
Social Services Administration Board (DSSAB) ran the gamut from
strong support through ambivalence to staunch opposition, but in the
final tally the decision was made to take over the delivery of
ambulance service in the DSSAB cachement area by January, 2004.
"For the end-user it will have little or no effect," said DSSAB Chief
Administrative Officer Gary Champagne, indicating that there is no
anticipated change to the service as far as the public is concerned.
"We are ultimately responsible for the service now, whether that
service is delivered by a private contractor or by the board. The
buck stops here either way."
The decision culminated a process which encompassed in-camera
discussions through an entire day of meetings on March 5, and
included an hour-long in-camera session before the March 6 meeting
where the final motion was passed and a further 15-minute discussion
just prior to the vote.
Divisions on the vote amongst board members were clear from the
comments prior to the final recorded vote (called for by Chair Frank
Gillis).
"I supported bringing this resolution forward to the board," said
Northeastern Manitoulin and the Islands Mayor Ken Ferguson, citing
the great deal of effort which went into the proposal by staff and
the sub-committee members. "But it has come to me that there is
another route we should be entertaining."
Mayor Ferguson said he believed the current contractors should have
been given an opportunity to submit proposals to the board and that
perhaps a call for RFPs (request for proposals) should be made prior
to a final decision.
"They have had plenty of opportunity to sharpen their pencils," said
Mr. Gillis.
There was a meeting between the three private operators and the DSSAB
in October, 2002, noted Dave Hill of Rainbow North Emergency
Services, one of the contractors.
"But that centred on how to improve the service delivery," he said.
"There was no discussion of funding costs."
Mr. Hill said that although there was some suggestion that some
administrative staff would be offered positions within the new
structure, and although the paramedics and other front-line staff
would likely continue, the position regarding support and clerical
staff was not as clear.
"Are they going to be expected to travel from here to Espanola?" he
asked. "That is not clear at this time."
The proposal to bring the $5.1 million ambulance services contract
'in-house' cited anticipated savings of a minimum of $100,000 per
year.
"That is a conservative estimate," said Mr. Champagne. "We want to be
sure it is realized."
The DSSAB ambulance services budget is $6.1 million in total, with
$5.1 million going to three private contractors, Espanola Hospital,
the Town of French River and Rainbow North EMS. The remaining $1
million covers DSSAB administration costs and the supply of major
equipment.
"It is important to remember that 90 percent of the budget goes to
salaries and benefits," said Mr. Champagne.
Espanola Mayor Marcel Rancourt said he was in support of the motion
on the general principal that medical service belonged in the public
sector.
"In this case I don't think 'for-profit' is the way to go," he said,
expressing the opinion that for the public and for employees,
operation were more secure under a public entity. "The province
created this issue, and they dumped it onto us," he added.
Les Gamble, of the Township of Sables-Spanish questioned the
anticipated savings and suggested that in light of the satisfactory
service delivered by the private contractors, the board's move to
bring the administration in-house amounted to "stabbing them in the
back."
"This board has not sat down and talked to them in the last three
years," said Mr. Gamble. "I think we should be sitting down with them
and asking them to help us out."
One representative said he took offense to the suggestion that the
decision amounted to stabbing the private contractors in the back.
"There is a process here and we have followed it," said Jack Barr,
representative for Sudbury's unorganized townships.
Many of the 19 municipalities served by the DSSAB had not had an
opportunity to formally input on the decision, French River
representative Vince Lacroix noted.
"They didn't get a say," he said.
Both Chair Frank Gillis and West Manitoulin representative Pat Best
noted that they were of very mixed feelings on the matter. Ms. Best
said she felt a number of her constituents fell on both sides of the
proposal.
"This may very well be a good thing," she said. "But they didn't get
the time to give their input. I wish they had more time to be
included. I feel sorry for the small guy."
But not all members agreed that there was not enough time to make an
informed decision.
"The committee has been working on this since last summer," said Ray
Chenier. "All the member municipalities have a representative (on the
DSSAB). They are not separate and to say they were not told is not
correct."
There was nonetheless some concern expressed by Mayor Ferguson that
as the discussions on the ambulance service were conducted in camera,
little discussion could be held by DSSAB representatives with their
constituents without danger of breaching confidentiality.
Janet Whissel, who represents Sudbury West, cited a need for
stability as a principle factor in her decision to support the move
and stated there was little point in delaying the decision any
further.
"Health care is very, very important," she said. "We have had that
before us for over a month. Today is the day to make a decision.
"The decision is to be made by the people sitting at this table,"
agreed Markstay-Warren representative Willy Leveillie, reiterating
that the committee had considered three options: the status quo;
consolidation of the contracts; bringing the administration in-house.
"The decision is would we do it as well or better, could we do it
cheaper? A lot of work was done on this, it wasn't done half-cocked."
A general perception of fairness and an admiration for the amount of
work put into the process was almost universally expressed by the
DSSAB members.
"The process was very fair," asserted Chapleau representative Earle
Freeborne. "There were no pre-determined ideas, no pre-ordained
goals. This decision is in our best interests."
"It was very well presented," said Dale Van Every. "I had some
misgivings at first, I thought it would be much like the school bus
issue for the Island. As the meeting on Wednesday progressed, I think
a lot of people changed their minds on both sides of the question."
|
|
District Social Services
Administration Board |
by Michael Erskine
ESPANOLA---The province will be picking up a larger share of the tab
for delivering social service programs on Manitoulin Island and in
the areas surrounding Sudbury next year, as the agency which
administers those social service programs has gathered sufficient
support to make changes to the apportionment of costs paid by the
unorganized townships and the Township of Killarney.
The Manitoulin Sudbury District Social Services Administration Board
(DSSAB) passed an apportionment formula at its last meeting which
will see the unorganized townships portion of the assessed DSSAB
costs rise to 19.9 percent (from 19.2 percent) of the total budget.
The change marks the third major tinkering with the apportionment
formula since the DSSAB was first formed in 1998.
In order to make the changes to the apportionment formula, a
so-called 'double majority' of municipalities was required. A double
majority is a majority of municipalities, which must also contain a
majority of the electors in the cachement area. DSSAB Chair Frank
Gillis indicated a sufficient number of municipalities to meet the
double majority criteria had passed resolutions in favour of the
change.
The new apportionment formula passed by the DSSAB will take into
account 'payments in lieu'(PIL) of taxes. PILs are paid to
municipalities by the upper levels of government for properties, such
as radio towers or parks, on which the municipality cannot collect
taxes.
The new apportionment formula will hit Killarney hard, the presence
of two parks in the Killarney area will mean an apportionment
increase of more than $170,000, or around a 50 percent increase in
their DSSAB assessment. Although the municipality should receive a
Community Reinvestment Fund (CRF) adjustment in 2004 to offset the
increased levy, those funds are received a year later, leaving the
town scrambling to make up the shortfall in the interim.
"They will be paying more in 2003, but then they should collect more
in CRF funding in 2004 to make up the difference," said DSSAB Chief
Administrative Officer Gary Champagne.
CRF funding are payments which the province gives municipalities to
offset any difference in tax base related to the redistribution of
social service responsibilities instituted by the province in 1998.
The inclusion of PILs was implemented largely at the behest of the
Island municipalities, to better reflect the resources of communities
by including all revenue streams.
However, another somewhat related issue was not dealt with in the
apportionment formula, as municipalities which receive grants for
dams in their cachement area, such as Espanola, have been essentially
'let off the hook.'
"Those are not PILs," said Mr. Champagne. "The provincial government
calls those grants."
The technicality is not completely semantic, as the grants are
awarded from year to year and are not a guaranteed source of revenue
for municipalities, nor are they set from a universally known
formula. The same complaint is often made by municipalities about CRF
funding, however, as few municipal politicians believe the CRF
funding will continue indefinitely. Still, the province has issued
municipalities a booklet explaining precisely how CRF payments are
calculated, an action it has not done in the case of grants.
The Manitoulin Sudbury DSSAB is one of 47 Consolidated Municipal
Service Managers (CMSM)s created by the province during 1998, and one
of 10 DSSABs in Northern Ontario. The DSSABs have many of the same
responsibilities as Counties and Regions with regards to delivery and
funding of social services.
Unorganized townships are a distinctly northern issue, as no southern
DSSABs include unorganized townships. The provincial government pays
for all of the DSSAB apportionment allocated to unorganized
townships, which makes the new formula essentially a mechanism to
transfer .7 percent more of the DSSAB budget to the province. The
amount is equal to what the municipalities believed the province
would pay when they moved from the initial one-third formula to the
provincial default in 2000.
|
Lake Huron boasts much ice
for March
|
by Neil Zacharjewicz
LAKE HURON - Even the Canadian Coast Guard is impressed with the
amount of ice currently on Lake Huron.
"There is a lot of ice on Lake Huron," stated Ralph Hilchie, Ice
Service Specialist with the Coast Guard. He said, in comparison
to
past years, there is quite a bit of ice for this time of year.
He
estimated Lake Huron is still 80-90 percent covered in ice.
Apparently, the large amount of ice is not limited to Lake
Huron,
either. Officials with the Coast Guard indicated Lake Superior
is
completely frozen over.
|
|
Little Current remembered |
by Cheryl Waugh
NORTHEASTERN MANITOULIN and the ISLANDS (NEMI) --- Little
Current
will be remembered.
The thoroughbred race horse, who died on January 19 at the age
of 32,
was declared the town of Northeastern Manitoulin and the Islands
(NEMI)'s most 'famous namesake' by council last Wednesday
evening. A
statue of the horse will be built somewhere in the community in
the
near future.
Business Improvement Area President Marilee Hore and Jib Turner
attended council to ask that Little Current be declared NEMI's
most
famous namesake. "I think this is an opportunity that we don't
want
to see go by," said Mr. Turner. "There has been quite a few
discussions about it, and there are quite a few people who are
willing to jump on board."
Mr. Turner noted that there is an ongoing effort to elevate
Little
Current into the Thoroughbred Race Horse Hall of Fame, based in
Saratoga Springs, New York, and if that effort was eventually
rewarded it would bring "some notoriety to the town as well as
the
horse."
Little Current won both the Preakness and the Belmont Stakes in
1974,
and was the champion three-year-old colt of that year. The fact
that
he missed out on capturing the Triple Crown - he lost at the
Kentucky Derby - is a bit of a sore point with Little Current's
most
ardent fans.
Kevin Grace, who works with the Maryland Racing Commission, and
is
spearheading the charge to get Little Current into the hall of
fame,
said Little Current should have won the Kentucky Derby in 1974.
"It was the year after Secretariat had won, and everybody
entered the
Derby. There were 23 horses in that race. No horse has ever had
to
compete with 22 other horses," said Mr. Grace.
Little Current was blocked several times as he tried to make his
move
to the front of the pack, eventually he passed 16 horses, as he
moved
into fifth place. It was where he would finish.
A few more lengths more, said Mr. Grace, and Little Current
would
have passed the winner.
The next year, the Kentucky Derby instituted the "Little
Current"
rule that stipulated no more than 20 horses could run the race.
Still, winning two-thirds of the Triple Crown is no small
matter, and
in the fall of 1974 Little Current's owner, John Galbreath was
given
a key to the town of Little Current. Mr. Galbreath had a cottage
in
the Killarney area and had named the horse after the north shore
town.
Mr. Galbreath told the Daily Racing Form in 1974 that it was
'positively delightful' to have received the town's key. "They
gave
us the key to the town and everybody was pleased. The key was
attached to a lovely piece of fine cedar and we were very
pleased to
have it."
Now, 29 years later, NEMI will honour Little Current's memory.
Mr. Grace said what the town was doing was a 'wonderful' thing.
"I'm
happy with what's happening there. It's a big honour." And, said
he
will keep plugging away at getting Little Current into the hall
of
fame. "I'm trying to educate folks about the horse. I can't
change
history, but I am trying to get him the notoriety he should
have."
And, because of the famous race horse, the former town of Little
Current, now incorporated into NEMI, has a legacy on which to
build
on.
In a letter to NEMI Council, Ms. Hore pointed out that "the
publicity
surrounding the elevation of the horse bearing this community's
name
to the prestigious Thoroughbred Race Horse Hall of Fame in
Saratoga
Springs, New York cannot help but reflect positively on the town
of
Little Current and indeed all of Northeastern Manitoulin and the
Islands."
Mr. Turner said it shouldn't be too difficult to put a group
together
to come up with the capital to put a statute of the horse in the
community. He noted that the statue could become another point
of
interest for tourists to NEMI. "It's stuff like this that when
I'm
travelling I wander off to look at," said Mr. Turner.
Meanwhile, the hall of fame announces its inductees the week of
the
Kentucky Derby, which runs the first Saturday in May. Mr. Grace
is
asking supporters of Little Current to send letters to the
nomination
committee. Letters should be addressed to: NationalMuseum &
Racing
Hall of Fame, 191 Union Ave., Saratoga Springs, NY, 12866-3566,
Attention: Ed Bowen, Nomination Committee.
For more information on Little Current, see Mr. Grace's website
at
www.littlecurrent.net.
|
|