June 2, 2004 ARCHIVE

Biosphere battle still on

by Tom Sasvari

GORE BAY - Manitoulin and Cockburn Island councils have been asked to consider signing an agreement that no municipality would take any action in support of the Islands being designated a UNESCO World Biosphere reserve or similar designation, without an Island-wide municipal plebiscite being held.

"Yes, all the Island municipalities passed resolutions against the Island being a world biosphere reserve. This would be the next step, that no one would go alone and sponsor the designation," said Ken Noland, reeve of Burpee-Mills Township at a Manitoulin Municipal Association (MMA) meeting last week. "We are looking at a motion from the MMA to take back to councils for support."

"All the recent publications I've seen already seem to designate Manitoulin as a biosphere designated area. In the May 13 edition of the Globe and Mail, they highly rated Manitoulin Island and Oak Ridges as the only two areas in Ontario designated as a biosphere. And the Nature Conservancy of Canada included the Manitoulin alvars in its campaign to protect 50 of the country's significant natural masterpieces. Regardless of what has taken place on the Island, it seems as far as these publications are concerned it is a fait accomplis that the Island is under the biosphere designation," stated MMA chair Richard Stephens.

"I think it will be a fight to not have the Island designated and we need to stick together," said Mr. Stephens.

"If the proposed agreement is given support by the municipalities, it would state that before anything happens concerning the designation it would have to include a vote of everyone on the Island," said Mr. Noland. He said a motion is required of the MMA for individual municipalities on Manitoulin and Cockburn to consider the Islands wide agreement.

Mr. Noland explained Burpee-Mills Township and the other Island municipalities considered the biosphere designation process, and all of them have supported the MP3Philes in opposition to the designation.

"What we need is an agreement in place that none of our municipalities would sign on as a partner. If one municipality or First Nation does support the designation, the proponents of this can run with it. In Parry Sound they did and one has been ongoing there for five years, without the municipality and majority of the residents knowing it. We won't be able to work together in opposition to the designation unless it is Island wide."

It was pointed out by Karen McGregor, representing the United Chiefs and Councils of Manitoulin (UCCM) that as a member of the MMA she would like to bring this proposed agreement back to the UCCM for their consideration.

The proposed agreement states, "No signatory municipality herein will pass any by-law, resolution, or take any other corporate action in support of Manitoulin Island and Cockburn Island being designated a UNESCO World Biosphere reserve or site without there first having been held a municipality administered plebiscite in all the signatory municipalities giving majority approval in each such municipality to the pursuit of the said UNESCO designation. Each signatory municipality will forthwith pursue passage of a by-law adopting this agreements as the substance of the said by-law."

The MMA passed a motion to have the agreement sent back to municipal councils on Manitoulin and Cockburn, and the UCCM for their consideration and to have an amended motion sent back to the MMA.

Central Manitoulin may sell Providence Bay Harbour Centre

by Neil Zacharjewicz

PROVIDENCE BAY - Some residents of Providence Bay are steamed to learn that the Providence Bay Harbour Centre is one of several properties that Central Manitoulin Township Council is considering for possible sale.

"I can't see that happening. In fact, I would oppose it," stated Murray McDermid, chair of the Development Implementation Committee (DIC) in Providence Bay.

"Are they so desperate for money (that they would sell the Harbour Centre)?" questioned Irene Cornish, owner and operator of the Providence Bay Tent and Trailer Park. "It is a drawing card for Providence Bay. It is beautiful."

Concern over the future of the Providence Bay Harbour Centre stems from an inventory process currently being undertaken by Central Manitoulin Township of all of the property that it owns. Reeve Richard Stephens indicated that the township is going through its inventory list to see how many properties the municipality owns that currently do not provide any sort of municipal surplus. He pointed out that the township pays between $25,000 and $30,000 annually in upkeep for the building, and it could be divested if it is not serving a purpose to the community. He questioned why the township would continue to spend money on buildings such as the Harbour Centre.

"Maybe it has a bigger and better claim to life in somebody else's domain," Reeve Stephens said. "It is certainly not the only property we are looking at either."

While the town will be looking at all of the property it owns, Reeve Stephens did indicate that the township's arenas should be safe.

"We all know that arenas serve a purpose to the community," he said.

Reeve Stephens indicated the township will consider the inventory of its property at the June 8th meeting of the Property Committee.

"It is all in the planning stages right now," he said. "It is what I would consider a normal business practice."

This is not the first time Mr. McDermid has heard Reeve Stephens suggest selling the Harbour Centre, he said. He explained that he heard Reeve Stephens raise the idea once before at a meeting, at which time Mr. McDermid challenged Reeve Stephens on the issue.

Mr. McDermid indicated that the Harbour Centre was built at a time when government money was readily available, and while it was not the larger marina project the township had hoped for, it was always intended to be a not-for-profit facility. He added that the council of the day had accepted that this would be the situation.

"This is an expected announcement to me," Mr. McDermid said. "I certainly will talk to my local municipal representatives."

"Why isn't the township writing us a letter or giving us a call?" asked Ms. Cornish, who expressed concern about a lack of public input. She pointed out that her tent and trailer park draws 600 to 700 visitors to the community each year, and one of the most popular things for those visitors to do is walk the boardwalk and visit the Harbour Centre.

"Where does it end? They have taken everything away from us. They would close the marina if they had their way," stated Ms. Cornish. "The only thing they can't take away from Providence Bay is that beach."

First Response teams under scrutiny

by Cheryl Waugh

MANITOULIN --- The Manitoulin Sudbury District Social Services Administration Board will be conducting an evaluation of the district's Emergency First Response Teams in order to ascertain the effectiveness of the program.

Tehkummah Township and Cockburn Island both have Emergency First Response Teams (EFRTs). In the 1970s, EFRTs were approved by the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care's Emergency Health Services Branch in communities where ambulance resources were requested but where the ministry felt that an ambulance resource was not a viable option. The EFRTs are not an ambulance service, but they are dispatched to emergency calls by an ambulance dispatch centre. They are not to transport patients and any vehicles used in a response are not considered to be emergency vehicles.

On January 1, 2004, the area's EFRTs came under the direct support of the Manitoulin Sudbury District Social Services Administration Board (DSSAB) after being 'bonded' to the DSSAB's contracted ambulance service providers from January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2003.

Dan Hammond, director of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) for the DSSAB, gave a presentation to the board of directors on the EFRTs last Thursday.

He explained that EFRTs are not mandated to respond to any calls, and are not regulated under legislation by the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care. "They have been administered over the years under very loose 'protocols,'" he said.

He added that any attempt to regulate the volunteer program would kill it. "Some people may think I'm out to kill it - I'm not - we need to clarify what it is, what it should be and where we're going with it," said Mr. Hammond. "I'm suggesting a complete evaluation of the program be done, but not with any pre-determined idea of what our findings would be."

There are 72 EFRT members in seven areas within the DSSAB district. Cockburn Island has 12 members, while Tehkummah Township has nine. Cartier, French River Delta, Markstay, St. Charles and Warren have the 51 other members.

While the EFRTs are not an ambulance service, they do respond to ambulatory incidents. Code four calls are considered ambulance emergencies, which includes incidents such as heart attacks, bleeding victims, or other medical emergencies.

In 2003, the EFRTs responded to 155 calls, of which 116 were code fours. In 2002, the EFRTs responded to 140 calls, of which 128 calls were code fours, according to the DSSAB's call volume information sheet.

The Tehkummah EFRT members responded to 15 calls in 2003, of which 12 were code fours. In 2002, they responded to 14 calls, of which 13 were code fours.

Gary Brown, who is a captain with the Tehkummah Township Fire Department and a member of the Tehkummah EFRT, said he thinks it's a good idea that the DSSAB has undertaken an evaluation of the emergency response program.

"Nothing bad can come of an evaluation," said Mr. Brown. "Maybe this can lead to more training or more money. It doesn't cost them a lot now. We're all volunteers. They supply us with our van, as well as our equipment, which they own; although some of it has been donated over the years," he said.

He explained that Tehkummah's Emergency First Response Team is fully trained in Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), First Aid, the use of a defibrillator, and have gone through a Ministry of Health approved, 60 hour course called Emergency First Response (EFR).

That training includes learning how to use backboards, neckbraces, and administering oxygen therapy. EFRTs are trained to the level of an ambulance service, however, they are not allowed to administer drugs.

In the Tehkummah area, the closest ambulance service is the Mindemoya hospital, a half-hour away. If that ambulance service is on a call, it falls to Wikwemikong or Little Current. While it doesn't happen very often, Mr. Brown said occasionally an ambulance has to come to the area from Gore Bay.

"There's no quick response call to this area," said Mr. Brown. "If someone is having trouble breathing, a problem with bleeding, has a broken hip or having a heart attack, we can be there quickly. We can use a defibrillator to keep people alive until an ambulance arrives.

He said one reason why the area has an emergency response unit is because of the traffic the Chi-Cheemaun brings through the area, but another reason is simply the community aspect of the program.

"Our main goal is to please the community," said Mr. Brown. "The first response teams offer a family touch because we know people in our community. Their confidence in us means more to the members of the EFRTs than anything that any government could ever give us."

As for Cockburn Island, there is no data available of their calls because the EFRT members have not had a call in over two years.

Cockburn Island Councilor Brenda Jones has been acting as a liaison between Cockburn Island, the DSSAB and the EFRT members. A member of Cockburn's EFRT unit, Ms. Jones said she was unaware of the DSSAB's plans for EFRTs at this time. The Cockburn Island team works in such a remote area that there is no vehicle access, emergencies have to be responded to either by plane or by boat.

The year-round population on Cockburn Island is two people, although that increases to about 100 in the summer months. "It's more of a vacation spot," said Ms. Jones. "The type of incidents that we would respond to would be more accident prone, like a flipped four-wheeler or someone falling off a roof. Because we're so remote, if anything did happen, it would likely take us two hours to respond."

She said there are two fully trained EFRT members on the Island during the summer from Monday to Friday. On the weekend, it depends on who is at their cottage.

According to Mr. Hammond, EFRT members are given approximately 60 to 80 hours of training, which includes Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), First Aid, and Emergency First Response (EFR).

Ms. Jones said last fall the DSSAB helped get some members of her crew trained as fully certified EFRTs, although some members of her crew still only have first aid. She is still waiting on new equipment, including potential satellite phones that would allow Cockburn Island residents to phone a 9-1-1 type number for service.

Now that it is acting as a 'host' for EFRTs, the EFRTs come under the liability of the DSSAB. The DSSAB also administers the program, and provides training and equipment that the team's need to respond to emergencies. In fact, in April of 2003, all of the EFRTs were temporarily suspended from being dispatched to calls until the DSSAB was assured that the EFRTs had the same personal protection and related training to deal with the SARS outbreak that was provided to all ambulance personnel.

Mr. Hammond told the DSSAB board of directors that some of the teams are pushing for red lights on their vehicles, or have requested that the DSSAB provide for safety footwear as part of the uniforms, which some teams may or may not have. As well, there are requests for more or better communications equipment and extra patient care equipment, he said.

"What are our obligations for volunteers of a host organization, when they are responding to calls as part of our EMS system?" asked Mr. Hammond. "We need a complete evaluation of the program."

The evaluation, he said would ascertain the effectiveness of the program, the costs, liability implications of having volunteers of another organization responding to EMS calls, whether the DSSAB should take more or less ownership of the program, and whether the present EFRT members are adequately and properly covered either through the DSSAB or their host organization.

Mr. Hammond said an evaluation of the EFRT program, with resulting recommendations could be completed for the December 2004 board meeting.

Northeast town approves recycling pick-up for Little Current

by Neil Zacharjewicz

NORTHEASTERN MANITOULIN and the ISLANDS - A Blue Box recycling program has been approved for Little Current.

At its meeting of Tuesday, May 25, council for the Town of Northeastern Manitoulin and the Islands (NEMI) approved a proposal from Municipal Waste and Recycling Consultants to offer bi-weekly curbside Blue Box pick-up of recyclables to residents of Ward Two (Little Current). The Blue Boxes are to be made available to the public at a cost of $8.50 plus applicable taxes. According to Clerk-Treasurer Ned Martin, it is estimated the program will begin in the next two to three weeks, once the town has had the opportunity to provide the public with notice of the new service.

The program was recommended to council by the Public Works Committee, and Public Works Chair Councillor Tony Ferro said statistics suggest that with a curbside pick-up program, the amount of recyclables being taken in by the town should close to double.

"People are going to recycle even more," he suggested.

Curbside pick-up should also mean a reduction in the number of people and traffic to the town's landfill site, he said. But the main reason Councillor Ferro is pleased that the town is implementing the program is for the sake of the elderly.

"I really am concerned with the elderly," he stated. He said he knows a curbside recycling program has been on their minds, and this will keep them from having to make the trip to landfill site each week. Some of those residents, he pointed out, don't drive.

Councillor Ferro explained the town will not have to pay the full cost for the program, as the provincial government currently offers a subsidy that will cover 50 percent of the total cost for the curbside program.

"The addition of curbside recycling will be paid for by the residents of Ward Two, but subsidized by the province," suggested Mayor Joe Chapman. "It should be very helpful to seniors and people without a car or truck. It is also good to encourage recycling as the greater participation we have in recycling, the longer our dump will last before it is filled."

Council also approved a motion that may see a change in hours at the NEMI Landfill Site, pending the approval of the Ministry of the Environment. According to Councillor Ferro, the new proposal will see the landfill site open four days a week, but at reduced hours. Under the new proposal, the hours for the landfill will run from 10 am until 2 pm on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays, and from 2 pm until 6 pm on Sundays during the cottage season, which will begin on the third Sunday in May and conclude on the third Sunday of October.

While the number of days the landfill site is open per week has increased, Councillor Ferro noted that the town realizes some savings from a decrease in the overall number of dump hours. Under the new schedule, the number of hours the landfill is open would drop from 24 hours to 16 hours per week.

Councillor Jim Stringer had questioned how much of a cost savings the town would realize from the change in hours, pointing out that there is additional work that must be done before the landfill site is opened each day.

However, Councillor Ferro indicated that the issue had been discussed with town staff, and the feeling was they could get the job done within the allotted time.

"Staff indicated it could be done. I think we have got to take their word for it," said Mayor Chapman. "The re-working of the dump schedule allows far better access for our seasonal residents. Many people come to their cottages for the weekend and don't want to cart their garbage all the way back to the city. This fulfills an important promise I made during the election campaign last fall. Almost all seasonal residents wanted this change. Best of all, it can be done at no extra cost to the taxpayer."