|
Usage drops on late Chi-Cheemaun
sailing but schedule stays firm
Owen Sound Transportation Co. board considers, and rejects, fuel
surcharge and altering schedule
by
Jim Moodie
SOUTH
BAYMOUTH-A sag in ridership and spike in gas prices are taking a
financial toll on the Chi-Cheemaun ferry, but representatives
decided last week to maintain the existing schedule and fee
structure for the remainder of this season.
"We
had a conference call (last Wednesday) and decided there would
be no changes," said Gary Brown, Tehkummah reeve and a member of
the Owen Sound Transportation Company (OSTC) board. "We have
nowhere to go, because if we were to introduce a fuel surcharge
or cancel a sailing, neither would be for the betterment of the
ferry service. And by the time you changed anything, the season
would be nearly over."
Traffic is down 8.5 percent from last year at this time, based
on figures collected during the first couple of weeks of the
summer sailing period, indicated Mr. Brown. "When you put a
downturn like that together with a 50 percent increase in fuel
costs, it's a tough hit to take," he said.
Still, Mr. Brown is hopeful that things can turn around before
the summer is over. "We're only two weeks into it, and don't
want to be alarmist. If we were running full, it wouldn't be a
problem."
Beginning on June 20, the ferry began its usual summer routine
of four sailings per day. It's the fourth or final sailing that
draws the fewest passengers, and the one that would go if the
OSTC took the drastic move of reducing service.
Mr.
Brown hopes it won't come to that. "Losing the last sailing of
the day would not be a positive thing," he said.
Were
that decision to be made, it would have to come from the
Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, which has
jurisdiction over the ferry service, said Mr. Brown. "We're
hoping the ministry will leave it as is," he indicated. "This
ferry is definitely a necessity to Manitoulin; if it's not
there, the tourist season is over."
Apart
from the obligation to provide a decent range of sailing options
to travellers, the OSTC also has a staffing situation in place
that it must honour. "We have two crews working two shifts,"
noted Mr. Brown. "You might save on fuel by cancelling one
sailing, but we're still dedicated to paying staff. And you'd
lose revenue from those people who weren't coming over on the
boat. So you would probably lose more than you'd gain."
Rather than cut back on service, efforts should be made to
attract passengers, suggested Mr. Brown. The late run from
Tobermory to South Baymouth usually draws a decent number of
travellers, but "going back has never been very good."
In
order to boost ridership on the
10 pm
sailing from South Baymouth, a 10 percent discount, offered for
the first time last summer, is available for commercial
vehicles. "It's a $400-$500 savings for truckers, which we're
offering to try to fill up the last sailing of the night," said
Mr. Brown.
Meanwhile, to save money on fuel costs, the Chi-Cheeman has been
running at half-power along a slightly altered course since last
month. "We made a decision at our last board meeting on June 22
to run on two engines and slow it down," said Mr. Brown.
The
change in speed and itinerary adds 15 minutes to the crossing,
but also scenery. "It's a more intriguing route that goes closer
to the land along Wiky," pointed out Mr. Brown.
And
while the sailing time has been extended, the timing of
departures has remained consistent, with the result that more
savings are reaped from less idling at the terminal. "The
turnaround is quicker so we save some money even at the dock,"
noted Mr. Brown. "We're doing everything we can to lessen our
cost and keep the prices where they are."
Fares
for the Chi-Cheemaun were set back in the winter, before the
price of fuel went through the roof. Prices for passengers did
rise slightly this year but not nearly enough for the company to
absorb the shock of skyrocketing gas costs.
"We've made a lot of concessions over the past few years," said
Mr. Brown. "There hasn't been much increase in rates, and at the
same time our subsidy (from the province) has gone from about
$1.2 million down to $800,000."
Last
season was the Chi-Cheemaun's first since it underwent a
$10-million engine overhaul that included replacing two
18-cylinder motors with four six-cylinder ones. The retrofit was
expected to reduce the ferry's fuel costs between 10 and 20
percent.
Mr.
Brown said that tinkering with the new motors is ongoing in
order to reap even more efficiency. "They're tuning the engines
more all the time, perfecting the system to get more out of
them," he said. "We're doing it with two now and still keeping
up."
Two-lane Mindemoya River bridge on schedule for '08 finish
New dam to follow in 2009
by
Jim Moodie
MINDEMOYA-Work has commenced on a new, wider span that will
relieve the bottleneck where Highway 542 crosses the Mindemoya
River,
while a dam replacement-insufficiently designed, to some
minds-will get under way next summer.
The
infamous one-lane bridge-the site of at least one nasty accident
over recent years-will remain in service for the remainder of
the summer, as a crew from Tera North Construction of Sudbury
erects its two-lane replacement just south of the current
structure.
Motorists, in other words, will have to put up with a bit of a
squeeze for a few more months, but on the other hand, there
should be no interruption to traffic flow in the interim.
"Traffic will continue to travel on the existing bridge until
the new bridge is opened," indicated Gordan Rennie, regional
issues advisor with the Ministry of Transportation (MTO).
A
preliminary design study for the project, which includes
replacement of the dam at the same location, was carried out
last year, with the final design phase completed this spring. On
May 12, the contract for the job, priced at $5.85 million, was
awarded to Tera North, and the Sudbury firm started levelling
earth and driving piles in June.
While
both the bridge and dam replacements are part of the same job,
the bridge portion comes first. "It's one project, but it will
take two construction seasons," explained Mr. Rennie.
"Basically, you have a one-lane bridge with a dam there now, and
will end up with a two-lane bridge and a separate control dam."
The
new dam, slated for construction in 2009, will occupy roughly
the same site as the current bridge/dam structure, while the
replacement bridge will be oriented just downstream. The
combined unit that currently exists was built way back in 1928,
so is long overdue for an overhaul.
Motorists will no doubt appreciate the broader-and
sturdier-route over the river, while shoreline dwellers and fish
stand to gain from an improved dam. Refinements in the new dam
design should "help improve water levels in both Lake
Mindemoya
and the Mindemoya
River," predicted MTO project manager Sergiy Morozevych, while
simultaneously enabling operators to "make fine adjustments to
levels during critical life-cycle stages of resident and
migratory fish species."
Still, some residents of the area remain irked that an allowance
for hydro-electrical generation wasn't factored into the dam's
design.
Last
month, a group dubbing itself "Manitoulin's Against Dam" (or
MAD, for short) was formed to lobby for a power component to the
river regulator. Spearheading this movement was Glenn Black, an
energy consultant from Providence
Bay.
"The
MTO put out a call for public comments back in February, and
after talking to some people, I asked if they were planning to
do anything with hydro-electrical generation," explained Mr.
Black. "I looked at the detailed engineering plan, and there was
nothing in there at all."
This
struck him as a glaring omission, particularly since information
available through the website of the International Energy
Commission cites the Mindemoya
River
as a promising location for power generation on Manitoulin,
second only to the
Kagawong River,
where a generating station already exists.
According to the figures Mr. Black was able to access, the
Mindemoya River
could generate 790 kilowatts per hour. "If you do the math and
multiply that by 80 years, the life expectancy of the dam, this
amounts to $18 million at the current price for energy," he
said.
Mr.
Black communicated his concern about this squandered resource,
as he views it, through the mechanism for public input to the
MTO, but was told he'd missed his chance to influence the
direction of the project.
"I
was told it's too late now, and I should have commented a year
ago," he said. "But I just saw (the invite for input) in
February."
Mr.
Rennie of the MTO explained that a 30-day period for public
review was announced back in the spring of last year, during the
preliminary design phase of the project, with submissions
welcomed until March 23, 2007. "The idea of hydro generation was
never raised during this public consultation phase and the
planning study was approved," he said.
A
more recent opportunity for public comment was made available
earlier this year, he conceded, but by that time "it related to
the design and construction, not the concept or location." The
chance to significantly influence the overall direction of the
project, in other words, had passed.
Mr.
Black and his fellow dam detractors (the MAD group counts eight
members) have now grudgingly accepted that the project can't be
altered at this point, and won't try to hold it up through a
Ministry of Environment appeal, but continue to question why a
chance to reap energy from the river wasn't factored into the
plans.
"Ontario's policy is to maximize hydro-electrical generation,"
said Mr. Black. "I understand it's late in the game, and Tera
North would have a claim against the province if we got a
stop-work order now, plus people are counting on these jobs, so
we're not going to do that. But it seems to me that someone was
asleep at the switch."
Mr.
Rennie, however, is adamant that the MTO has followed the proper
channels and shouldn't be criticized for overlooking an energy
option at the site. "Hydro-electric generation is beyond the
scope of the environmental assessment the ministry followed for
replacement of the bridge and dam, and outside the ministry's
mandate," he said. "We're about safe, reliable transportation;
the MTO does not plan or build hydro dams."
If a
power-producing angle were to be pursued for the Mindemoya
River
location, it would "require a proponent bringing this to the
Ministry of Natural Resources," said Mr. Rennie, as that
ministry has jurisdiction over such matters.
The
MNR, he added, was "involved throughout the planning process,
with staff on the project, and they're supportive of the
design." Had a power dam been perceived as a popular and viable
alternative, it likely would have been raised by MNR personnel,
he implied.
Mr.
Black isn't entirely swayed by this argument. He feels his group
was ignored by provincial bureaucrats, who had their minds set
on a course of action and weren't prepared to listen to
suggestions from the public lest it upset a plan that was
already preordained.
"They
stonewalled me through March and April to the beginning of May,
and then said it's too late and that they'd already awarded the
contract," he complained. "The MTO played some brinkmanship
here, with a full-speed-ahead, damn-the-torpedoes approach."
Mr.
Rennie insists otherwise. "We don't judge hydro potential," he
said. "The idea of introducing hydro-electric would require an
in-depth study and consultations with landowners throughout the
watershed, because it would have an impact on a lot of people.
It's outside the scope of what the MTO does, and would have to
be pursued through the MNR."
Mr.
Black is prepared to drop the fight at this point, although he'd
prefer to see a structure put in place that would leave the door
open to hydro options in the future. Small power-producing units
exist that can be incorporated into existing dams, drawing water
from the upstream side and pumping/siphoning the flow back
downstream, with little impact on fisheries, he said.
"One
dam I've seen had 12 of these 'micro-hydro' generators on top,"
he said. "They can actually benefit fish, because a big issue is
water spilling over a dam and causing a huge flow that eats into
riverbanks and covers gravel beds, wrecking spawning areas. If
you're extracting energy, the water still goes through, but
there's a lot less turbulence."
His
fear is that the new dam won't be flexible enough in its design
to allow such future additions. "The time to make allowances for
this is now, because if it's not built to accommodate this,
you'd spend half of what you'd make from (the generated energy)
just rebuilding the structure and getting it back to square
one."
N.E. Manitoulin Family Health Team
moves into spacious new quarters
by
Lindsay Kelly
LITTLE CURRENT-Less than a year after construction crews turned
the first soil, patients, doctors and staff at the Northeastern
Manitoulin Family Health Team (FHT) gathered at the clinic on
July 8 to celebrate the facility's grand opening.
Staff
have been treating patients at the new building since May, but
last week's celebration was an opportunity to recognize the hard
work of the partners involved in the health team project, and to
let the public tour the facility.
"On
September 19, 2007 we dug a hole right here, and here we are 11
months later with this new building," said health team director
Judy Miller in addressing the crowd. "We have tons of people who
worked extremely hard to do that."
The
new facility includes an expanded registration area, and a total
of seven examination rooms will be available for the doctors'
use, three of which have been expanded to accommodate
handicapped patients. The added space will allow students from
the Northern Ontario School of Medicine, who are doing their
residencies at the clinic, to sit in on consultations and learn
from local doctors.
Office space has also been set aside for the social worker,
dietitian, locum doctors and the med school students at the west
end of the clinic, although the dentist will still work out of
the same office. Additionally, the boardroom will be set up for
videoconferencing-similar capabilities to those currently
available at the hospital-so that doctors can consult with
specialists about patient care.
Manitoulin Health Centre (MHC) CEO Derek Graham joined Ms.
Miller in thanking key players Dr. Ken Barss, MHC chair Karen
King and project manager Barry Parsons for their support in
kicking off the project, as well as the work of contractors
Prosperi and Belanger.
The
new clinic will help staff provide patients with top-of-the-line
primary care, and act as a model for other health-care
facilities, Mr. Graham said. "I hope this facility will stand as
a beacon for health care in our community for years and years to
come," he said.
Mayor
Jim Stringer, who brought greetings and congratulations on
behalf of the Northeast Town, recalled the day, three years ago,
when project planners approached the council for its support for
the Family Health Team. Council was at first skeptical that such
a seemingly daunting project could be successful in Little
Current, he noted. However, the hard work of everyone involved
has made it happen, and the clinic is a boon to the
municipality, both in the excellent health care it will provide
and the economic boost it brings through the creation of jobs,
he added.
"Your
vision, your dedication and your hard work turned a dream of
better health care on Manitoulin into a reality," the mayor
said. "It is greatly appreciated."
Dr.
Ken Barss, one of the doctors who spearheaded the project, noted
that it really was due to a group effort that the health team
came into being. "They say it takes a whole community to raise a
child," he said. "But it also takes a whole community to raise a
Family Health Team."
He
praised Dr. Roy Jeffery as the "visionary" who originally
brought the idea of the health team forward as a possibility,
while Dr. Ariana helped pen the proposal and Dr. McIlquham
offered her editing skills; Dr. Ariana, along with Dr. Steve
Cooper, also worked together on the negotiations with the
Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care.
Dr.
Barss additionally praised the hospital staff, including Mr.
Graham, board chair Karen King and former CEO Jim Van Camp for
their ongoing support for the project, as well as the town and
"all levels of government who supported the concept of a health
team in Little Current."
Finally, he commended the staff for their patience during
construction, joking about how half of the old space was
essentially off limits and staff was "shoved into the other
half" while crews did renovations.
In
bringing the state-of-the-art Family Health Team to Little
Current, the medical staff is able to give back to the
community, Dr. Barss said. "From this point on, we need to keep
the community in mind when we make our decisions day to day," he
added.
Dr.
Roy Jeffery, who was the last to address the crowd, joked that
the last time he was called on to speak at a meeting, he was
left speechless, referring to the surprise announcement that he
had been named Regional Family Physician of the Year for
Northern Ontario. This time, he said, "I'm trying to make up for
it."
"I
want to make sure that all the staff and the community realize
that was not an accolade just taken by myself," Dr. Jeffery
said. "It really is an accolade taken by all my staff and
colleagues and the community."
From
the receptionists who greet patients and book appointments to
his colleagues and staff at the clinic and hospital, everyone
has a role that has helped continue to deliver health care
services during this time of transition, Dr. Jeffery added, and
the award is a testament to everyone's hard work.
"You've worked to make the transition as seamless as possible,
and it's gone amazingly smooth considering the background," he
added.
Before welcoming visitors to tour the site, Ms. Miller made a
special presentation to Mr. Parsons, in tribute to his role as
project coordinator. His work on the project will be
commemorated with a special plaque to be mounted on the stone
bench included at the front of the FHT building.
Mr.
Parsons is retiring this year, and he will be greatly missed for
his contributions, his energy and his dedication to his work,
Ms. Miller noted, adding, "We could not have done this without
him."
Following the opening, attendees were encouraged to cross the
street to the Legion where the MHC Auxiliary had prepared
refreshments, and visitors to the Family Health Team building
were given tours throughout the day.
MacMan race promises exciting finish
Public invited to watch the fun off downtown Little Current
docks
by
Michael Erskine
LITTLE CURRENT-The Mackinac-Manitoulin yacht race known
colloquially as the MacMan, is undergoing some changes this
year, and most of those changes will be great news to those who
find themselves land-bound on the docks.
"This
year the boats will be finishing up by Boyle's Marina, weather
permitting, in full sight of the people downtown," said race
co-chair Dave Naples. The incoming boats will be greeted by a
one-gun salute.
There
will also be a greeting event held at Spider Bay Marina and
people are fully encouraged to come down and participate.
"We
definitely want to get more people involved," said Mr. Naples.
"There will be live entertainment-Jackson Edwards, the same band
that's playing at the Anchor-and there will be plenty of good
food and fun for everyone."
A
tent will be set up at Spider Bay Marina and everyone is invited
to come on down. "I heard there were a lot of people who went by
last year thinking it was a private event," said Mr. Naples. "We
want to dispel that kind of rumour."
There
will be a Friday night fish fry and entertainment in Gore
Bay,
as usual, and the race will be coinciding with the Gore Bay
Lions Summerfest in that community. The fish fry is put on by
the Rotary Club, said Mr. Naples. "Tall tales have been known to
be told over dinner once the sailors wake up from their
overnight race from
Mackinac Island."
This
year's MacMan will include a new Cruiser's Net class, designed
to attract the more casual boater. "It's aimed really at the
folks who listen to Roy Eaton's Cruiser's Net broadcasts on VHS
radio," said Mr. Naples. "It will be strictly 'white sail,' no
spinnakers. We are looking for the cruise equipped, so bring
along your kids, dogs and galleys full of cans. Everyone can
join in the fun."
The
Cruiser's Net leg of the race will only run from Gore
Bay
to Little Current and will be strictly for boats without
spinnakers or gennikers.
The
model the race organizers are aiming for is based on a popular
100-mile race that takes place in Windsor. "The Windsor Yacht
Club's race finishes down in front of the club," said Mr.
Naples. "It is in a pretty built-up area, there are a number of
apartments and condos in the area, and people line their
balconies and along the shore to cheer the sailors on. It is a
real community event even though some boats finish as early as 5
or 6 am."
It is
hoped that the race will become a community-driven event here as
well, taking on a celebratory air that will attract people to
the area from communities across Ontario and Michigan and
beyond.
"This
is my first year working on the race committee and it has been
great to work with the veterans of the event, Jim Corliss,
Dennis Centis, Tony Nutt, Greg Wright, Bruce O'Hare, Mike
Wright, Roy Eaton and some of the newcomers like Sandy Naples,
Jim Bousquet and, of course, David Rowe, our counterpart in
Mackinac.
This
year will mark the fifth year of the MacMan race.
EDITORIAL
Importance of marine traffic shown by Rendezvous
The
sudden flurry of boating activity on the Little Current front
street docks that began last weekend-and the corresponding
bustle all over the town of Little Current-underscores the
importance of summer marine activity to the year-round
well-being of Manitoulin's North Channel ports.
Literally overnight, the shift from only a handful of boats at
the docks (about normal for the early part of July) to docks
filled to capacity was quite dramatic and the dozens of new
faces on downtown Little Current's front street and in and out
of businesses there drove home the point quite emphatically.
Our
port towns always reach this point at some time by late July.
But it's a gradual process: things get a little busier every day
and, ultimately, we don't notice until we realize we're much
busier.
But
not this year. It was sudden, at least in Little Current, when
about 100 boats (all associated with the Great Lakes Cruising
Club) showed up at the downtown docks and basically stayed put
from last Saturday until the middle of this week.
Gore
Bay
has also had this same phenomenon a couple of times when the
Great Lakes Cruising Club chose that North Channel port for its
annual Rendezvous destination.
The
last time Little Current played host to the event was 24 years
ago when Spider Bay Marina was brand new. In fact, the Great
Lakes Cruising Club inaugurated this then-new facility with
their Rendezvous event that year.
Little Current has gone all-out to ensure that the people on
their boats have a good and memorable visit. Gore
Bay
has done the same thing when that port has played host.
And
this does not go unobserved: people comment when they've had a
good time. They tell other boaters when they've been
disappointed.
Manitoulin's experience with the Great Lakes Cruising Club's
Rendezvous over the years has been positive. Many, if not most,
of the club's members are the same people who cruise the North
Channel almost every summer and so are used to the port
facilities and the merchants people in Meldrum
Bay,
Gore Bay,
Kagawong, Little Current and Killarney.
They
are friends of our ports. Most of them, if pressed, have
anecdotes to relate about their experiences in one or more North
Channel ports.
And
these anecdotes are usually funny or whimsical or indicate in
some fashion how well they've been treated as visitors-often in
times of personal stress.
The
Great Lakes Cruising Club yachtspeople have been welcome to use
Little Current as the setting of their annual get-together.
And
their substantial presence in this port town, even for a
relatively short stay, is a firm reminder of just how important
the transient summer boating community is to the economies of
our port towns.
Letters to the Editor
Honouring of Morgentaler with Order of Canada decried
Women have choices other than abortion
To
the Expositor:
What
have we Canadians come to? Awarding one of our highest honours
to an abortionist! We really are scraping the bottom of the
barrel. I am so proud of our Catholic friends who are returning
their awards in protest, but I want to assure everyone that
Catholics are not alone in their revulsion towards such a move.
Then we get letters of praise for this man who has allegedly set
women free, and we are back into all those labels-pro-choice,
pro-life.
I
find it frustrating because you see, I too am pro-choice. I,
too, believe women should have control over their bodies. But I
am also anti-abortion.
Can
these two views coexist? Of course they can. A woman can
exercise her choice in several ways.
She
can take control over her own body by choosing not to be
promiscuous, thus protecting herself against disease and from
unwanted pregnancies. Apart from incest or rape, that choice is
hers.
She
can choose to act on the premise that, regardless of media or
peer pressure to the contrary, every encounter or date does not
have to end in bed.
If
she chooses to be sexually active, she can also choose whether
or not to become pregnant. Fair or unfair, she is responsible
for the use of contraceptives since she is the one who will bear
the consequences. Fifty years ago it may have seemed
understandable to have unintended pregnancies but there is
little excuse for that today.
If a
woman becomes pregnant and is unwilling or unable to raise a
child, there are better options than abortion available to her.
She can give birth to the child she conceived and give it to one
of the many prospective parents waiting for such an opportunity.
She can choose not to take on the extra-heavy burden of guilt
that abortion brings by choosing to give that child nine months
of her time and energy. Again, 50 years ago this would have been
extremely difficult to do, but in today's more tolerant climate,
it is possible. It just requires that she make her choices in
favour of the innocent life she is carrying.
It's
a matter of choice.
Patricia Paulsen
Dominion Bay
Accountability is required from Children's Aid Societies
MPP Mike Brown is out of touch with supporters
To
the Expositor:
The
following is an open letter to MPP Mike Brown.
Dear
Mike,
In
the spirit of the timeworn phrase, "Who dares not offend, cannot
be honest," I write the following comments and observations.
I
have sent to you a site on the Internet that encourages the
reader to petition our government, of which you are reported to
be our representative. I point out the following observations:
¥There are 541 signatures at the time of this letter attached to
this petition, demanding that the Ontario Ombudsman's office be
given authority to investigate concerns/complaints of an
individual that has an issue with the CAS.
¥Of
the 541 signatures there are persons who purport to be
educators, CAS workers, users of the system and victims of the
system, and even one member of parliament has signed on.
¥As
recent as last week our local news media carried a letter from a
person who says that he and others have been wronged by the
non-action of CAS and have no avenue to appeal to what appears
to be honest complaint and cry for help.
¥I
myself was removed from the board of directors for the CAS and
to this day after urgings and letters sent to the CAS, the
family resources, your office, still am unaware as to why this
transpired; I was never given the pleasure of a hearing or
explanation. I often wonder why the government of the day,
yours, doesn't shake their heads in wonder as to why an
individual, who was removed from the CAS Board of Directors,
runs for and wins the office of public school trustee? It
certainly shows me the degree of credibility the public places
on the CAS and their activity.
Mike,
speaking for myself, I feel you are out of touch with your
supporters and citizens you serve-not new but very, very sad. I
ask you for a commitment to help those people in Ontario in a
meaningful way!
Will
you champion the request to give the Ombudsman the power to
probe decisions and investigate complaints concerning the
provinces Children's Aid Societies (CAS)? I am not asking you to
change the world, just require this entity to be accountable to
someone.
In
closing, all provincial Ombudsmen in the Dominion of Canada
first identified child protection as a priority issue in 1986
and still Ontario does not allow the Ombudsman to investigate
people's complaints about Children's Aid Societies (CAS)
decisions. Who knows, perhaps First Nations residential schools
would never have happened?
I am
assuming, Mike, that this is your last term and hope you want to
leave some sort of legacy of what you have or have not done.
What a way to end it Mike, helping kids!
Larry
Killens
South
Baymouth
|