|
Citizens
sign up for voluntary cormorant cull
Cite
Ministry of Natural Resources inaction
by Jim
Moodie
MANITOULIN-The May 24 weekend is generally a time for opening
cottages, kicking back with a few beers, perhaps trolling for
lake trout.
A
handful of monarchy-minded folks may still associate the weekend
with the birth of Queen Victoria, while a few diehard NHL fans
may cling to the faint hope of tuning into playoff hockey. One
thing that surely doesn't spring to mind for most when they
think of the long weekend is a vigilante cormorant cull.
Yet that
is precisely what a number of Islanders are planning to do on
the coming May long weekend.
For the
past week, a petition authored by the United Fish and Game Clubs
of Manitoulin (UFGCM) has been circulating on the Island, and
the pages are filling up fast. "We the undersigned," the
petition states, "agree to meet on the May 24, 2005 weekend to
cull as many cormorants as possible to protect what little is
left of our sports fishery. We will equip ourselves with all
necessary equipment."
Nowhere
in the petition is there direct mention of firearms, but it's
doubtful that 'equipment' here refers to a water pistol or a
leaf blower.
Asked
whether the group intends to shoot cormorants with guns, Rick
Gjos, a retired police officer and president of the Little
Current and District Fish and Game Club (and a representative on
the UFGCM) was at first coy, but later allowed, "If we have to
shoot them, we will. We're not going to touch the eggs-we're
going to cull the adult bird."
This is
against the law, according to John Boos, acting senior avian
biologist with the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR).
"Cormorants are protected under the Fish and Wildlife
Conservation Act. They're not a game bird; you can't get a
licence," he said. "They will be doing something that
contravenes the act."
Mr. Gjos
isn't convinced of the illegality, however. "Is it illegal?" he
asked. "I've never seen them on the endangered species list, and
they're not protected under the migratory birds convention act.
You don't need a licence to shoot a crow, do you?" he asked.
Bill
Strain, also a member of the Little Current and District Fish
and Game Club, said that he's prepared to break the law if that
is what it takes. "I really don't give a damn if I get a fine.
So what? I'm a patient man, but my patience has run out. I'll go
to jail over it if I have to," he said.
Mr.
Strain operates Whitehaven Cottages in Sheguiandah, which was
started by his parents in 1948, and he is intimately familiar
with the fishery in the Sheguiandah area. "I grew up here, and
guided during high school. I saw my first cormorant in 1980,
down in The Pool at the end of Baie Fine-and I thought, what the
hell is that?" he recalled.
Since
that time, the population of cormorants has exploded, and the
numbers of fish have decreased, said Mr. Strain. "We used to
have a good perch fishery in Sheguiandah Bay. I've seen these
birds work as a group, driving a school of fish into the
shallows where they just mutilate them."
Mr. Strain
sits on a stewardship council for the Northeastern Georgian Bay
region, and at a recent conference in Midland, members of
stewardship councils were able to listen to a presentation from
John Casselman, a fisheries biologist for the MNR. "He spoke
about these drags that they've been doing year after year in
certain locations, where they drag a long net like a wind sock
along the bottom. What's happening now is that everything is
disappearing-the alewives, smelt, sticklebacks, they're just
gone."
The
resort operator added that, "if you talk to anybody with
downriggers who goes out to Heywood Island and places like that,
they're not marking any bait fish on their fish finders. Five,
six years ago, there used to be clouds of them."
While Mr.
Boos admits that cormorants, whom he describes as "opportunistic
feeders," have driven down populations of bait fish, he pointed
to other factors as well. "We've had two years of alewife
reproductive failure because the lake (Huron) has been frozen
over the last two winters, and that affects them."
As a
result of the collapse of alewives, which represent the
cormorants' main food source, the cormorants themselves have
been reduced in numbers over the past couple of years, the
biologist said. "In 2000, there were 29,000 cormorant nests on
colonies in Lake Huron. In 2004, that number was down to
19,000-we've seen a 33 percent decrease in all of Lake Huron."
He
admits that the population remains high relative to a dozen
years ago. The new figure "brings us back to the numbers of the
late 1990s, and 20,000 nesting pairs is still a lot," he said.
Still, there are far fewer cormorants now than there were in
2003.
It isn't
a lack of alewives alone that accounts for the drop in
cormorants. Mr. Boos also credits the MNR's egg-oiling program
at certain sites in Georgian Bay and along the North Channel. By
coating the cormorants' eggs with a food grade mineral oil, the
embryo will die because the "the eggs are porous and need to
breathe," he said.
Breaking
eggs is ineffective, as cormorants will simply re-nest and lay
more eggs, but when eggs are oiled, the bird can be tricked into
sitting on the 'dud' egg. Mr. Boos noted that the process is
entirely humane, as the eggs "just contain yolks, not little
birds," and "if eggs do hatch on a colony, they're just left
alone."
"We've
gone from 12,000 nests on the study site to less than 6,000, so
egg-oiling is having an effect, a long-term effect," said the
avian biologist. Meanwhile, he said the MNR is in the fifth year
of a five-year study of the cormorant problem on Lake Huron.
"We're waiting for the results to come in, sometime in the new
year, and then we'll have a sense of what's next. During the
next month there will be meetings of the technical team (of
which he's a member) and the steering committee, and there will
be action items decided on."
Data
from the egg-oiling program will be combined with information
gleaned through a net study and studies involving
electro-fishing and hydro acoustics, Mr. Boos said, to provide a
comprehensive picture of the cormorant's impact on the fishery.
Mr. Boos
said that complaints about government inaction are unfair,
particularly since "the MNR has done more in Lake Huron than
anywhere else in the province." Cormorants are a problem all
across the Great Lakes, he noted, with Lake Ontario being
particularly affected.
Local
tourist operators and fishermen complain, however, that the MNR
has been inactive and evasive. "We've been lobbying the MNR for
years to do something and they're not doing it, so we're doing
something ourselves," said Mr. Gjos. "This five-year study
they've been doing, we haven't been able to get it-they don't
seem to want to release it."
Mr. Gjos
feels the egg-oiling initiative is worthwhile, but "it's not the
total answer. We think you have to cull some of the adult birds
as well to get the population down to a manageable size." He
added that the UFGCM has no intention of "decimating the
cormorants-we just want them to be manageable."
Pressure
from environmental groups is believed to have hindered the MNR
from authorizing a cull of adult birds. Mr. Boos pointed out,
however, that when the MNR authorized a cull at Presqu'ile Park
in order to protect trees, "we had all sorts of outpourings from
NGOs (non-governmental organizations), but the minister still
allowed that to happen."
For his
part, Mr. Gjos is surprised that an environmental group would
oppose a cull of cormorants, as "they're not just impacting the
fishery, they're also ruining vegetation on these islands (where
they roost) and affecting water quality. These cormorants also
take over nesting spots for gulls, egrets and terns."
It's the
dwindling number of sports fish, though, that is clearly the
main concern of the UFGCM. As Mr. Strain noted, "this past
summer, as a tourist operator, I had 32 northern pike come into
the cleaning table all season long. Back in the 1980s, you'd see
a dozen to 15 a day."
Mr.
Strain added that, as a teenager, "these hammer handles (small
pike, in the 12" to 14" range) were seen as pests; you couldn't
keep them off your hook. Now, all the smaller fish are taken by
cormorants."
Solely
blaming the cormorant for the decline in fish stocks is an
oversimplification of a complex issue, however. Even Mr. Strain
admits that "salmon are no doubt a factor too, because they're
not originally a fish in the Great Lakes."
Nor, for
that matter, are alewives-the cormorants' favourite snack.
"Alewives are an exotic species," noted Mr. Boos, likely
imported through the dumping of bilge water from boats. And as
their numbers decline, as they have recently, "we're seeing
native species like Lake Herring rebounding," pointed out the
biologist.
Cormorants
themselves are often said to have recently invaded the Great
Lakes, but that isn't technically true. Cormorants were
documented on Lake Huron in 1932, and existed in the thousands
in the 1940s, but the introduction of the pesticide DDT
decimated their numbers over the next two generations. It was
the banning of DDT, along with the introduction of such exotic
species as alewives, that largely accounted for their return and
recent boom.
No one
doubts that cormorants are having an impact on fish stocks. The
MNR maintains that the bird's principal diet is bait fish,
however, and remains skeptical of claims of cormorants eating
larger fish. "There are stories of cormorants eating 20" pike,
but I haven't seen it," said Mr. Boos. "Looking at their stomach
contents, you'll see they are opportunistic and will eat what's
available, but it has to be small." That said, Mr. Boos conceded
that, "if perch are abundant, I'm sure they'll eat perch."
Many
Islanders are getting fed up with what they perceive as stalling
tactics on the part of the MNR, and are prepared to, as Mr. Gjos
put it, "take a stand. Either that, or we just walk away and let
the fishery collapse."
Whether
the proposed cull indeed occurs remains to be seen, as does the
response of conservation officers, who presumably will be out to
enforce the law if it does. But boaters and canoe trippers
planning holiday excursions for the May 24 weekend may wish to
give cormorant rookeries a wide berth.
House fire
claims life
of Spring
Bay resident
by
Michael Erskine
SPRING
BAY-Friends and neighbours kept somber vigil outside the yellow
tape surrounding a Perivale Road home where a tragic fire is
believed to have taken the life of a Spring Bay man in the late
hours of December 2.
An
Ontario Provincial Police forensic identification team found
human remains in the ruins of the home, and a coroner was called
to the scene before the remains were removed and taken to
Sudbury for post-mortem and identification on December 3. The
services of a forensic dentist have been requested to assist in
the identification.
Although
Central Manitoulin, Burpee Mills and Gore Bay fire departments
had responded to the fire shortly after midnight on Thursday,
they arrived to find the house totally engulfed in flames. The
early morning light revealed that the building had been
completely destroyed in the blaze.
The OPP
and the Fire Marshal's Office are conducting a joint
investigation into the cause of the fire. That process may prove
long and difficult due to the massive damage the building
sustained from the intense heat of the fire; the building
literally burned down to the foundations, leaving only portions
of the basement walls standing.
The
elderly owner of the home at 2040 Perivale Road, Arleigh Coulam,
has not been accounted for since the night of the fire and is
presumed by most to be the deceased victim.
Friends
and neighbours described Mr. Coulam as a nice gentleman who was
very well thought of in the community.
Further
details of the actual identity of the victim will be released by
the OPP once positive identification has been established.
Whither the Wild?
Manitoulin Wild seeks
more
community support
by
Michael Erskine
MANITOULIN-The controversy surrounding Kenjgewin Teg Educational
Institute's involvement with the Manitoulin Wild has led to
numerous unfounded rumours about the team, particularly after
the UCCM chiefs called for a police investigation to insure no
criminal activity had occurred at the school. The former
association between the school and the Wild has led to the
team's co-owner and manager, Larry Leblanc, coming under a great
deal of personal grief as well.
Rumours
have been engendering inaccurate comment in Internet chat rooms
and local coffee shops, a factor that is adding a great deal of
difficulty to the already challenging job of running a Northern
Ontario Junior A Hockey team. The innuendoes Mr. Leblanc and his
family have been forced to endure as a result of the publicity,
he notes, would border on the ludicrous were they not so galling
when viewed in light of the reality of running a Junior A hockey
team in as challenging a market as Manitoulin.
It
should be clearly stated that the Manitoulin Wild are not under
police investigation, nor is there any credible suggestion in
the team's financial statements, acquired through sources
hostile to Mr. Leblanc's management, that the owners' of the
team have profited materially from their association with the
organization.
But the
suggestions of impropriety have the team's creditors clamouring
for immediate payment, even while Mr. Leblanc and his associates
scramble to keep the team afloat.
"I had to
pay for our most recent roadtrips out of my own pocket," said
Mr. Leblanc. "It hurts me personally when the team's bills
aren't kept up-to-date."
Despite
the current shaky financial position of the team, Mr. Leblanc
remains adamant that the franchise could be a viable operation
given a little more support.
"We have
the greatest fans in the league," he said. "You couldn't ask for
more."
But what
is missing from the equation that could put the team on secure
footing is support from the municipality or a significant major
sponsor.
"We have
the support of most of the businesses on the Island," he said.
"But a lack of major sponsors hurts us. What we need are a
couple of sponsors in $15,000 t0 $25,000 range."
Unfortunately, the only local candidates for a major sponsorship
role have turned the team down flat.
"North
Bay's access to a large number of national companies makes them
the only team in the league that really has a chance of making a
good profit," said Mr. Leblanc.
Former
Espanola Screaming Eagles owner Wilfred Auge knows exactly what
Mr. Leblanc is talking about.
"The
gate is only 10 percent of what a team needs to operate," he
said. "You need sponsorship from business, and that is not an
easy thing to do. We were always scrambling to make ends meet
and we had the support of Domtar."
Mr. Auge
suggested that members of the hockey going public might consider
providing indirect support to the team by sponsoring the needs
of individual players who cannot afford to play hockey on their
own.
"Help
them compete on an equal footing," he said. "I am sure on the
Island, not everyone can afford to play."
A
booster club is one of the ideas Mr. Leblanc is hoping will
catch on in the community to help keep the franchise on
Manitoulin.
"They
could operate a licensed event upstairs and get involved in
fundraising," he said. "Other communities have them. They could
host bingos and other things to raise money to help meet the
team's operating expenses."
Mr.
Leblanc has already been approached by one organization that has
offered to hold bingos to help the team.
"We
tried that," said Mr. Auge. "It takes a lot of effort. You have
to keep a lot of paperwork; there are legal ramifications. You
need a non-profit charter and those aren't easy to get."
Still, a
booster club can harness a great deal of community support if
enough people step up to the plate to make it work.
Raffle
tickets are also an option, he noted, but they, too, are
problematic, requiring a non-profit charter, unless you go
through the league.
"Then
they would probably want a cut," said Mr. Auge.
Coach
Stephane Soulliere knows first-hand about the sacrifices those
involved in Junior A hockey make for their team: he hasn't been
paid in months. Yet the coach keeps coming out to fulfill his
role on the team and still voices strong support for Mr.
Leblanc.
"Larry
is doing what he can to keep the team afloat," he said. "Without
help from the town and community its going to sink; it's
half-sunk already."
Mr.
Soulliere suggested that the town could help, if not by
providing free ice time, then by giving the team a percentage of
the concession booth sales.
"If we
had that we could pay for the ice time," he suggested. "That
alone might be enough to keep us afloat."
The team
players have also been without the $40 stipend they get for
expenses. Although the players are not paid much-peanuts as Mr.
Soulliere called it-they need that money for gas and food money,
or just the little things that make life better.
"One
player was asking me when they would be getting their $40," said
Mr. Soulliere. "He wants to be able to buy his brother a
Christmas present."
The
financial situation does have an impact on the players, he
added, even though they try to not let it bother them on the
ice.
"It's
still in the back of everyone's minds," said Mr. Soulliere.
One of
the issues Mr. Auge sees hampering the league is the reliance of
some clubs on money to attract, buy and sell players and the
expectation of players' parents that once they make it to the
Junior A level of hockey everything is paid for them.
"The
league put that out," he said. "Players do come from all over,"
he added, however, "It is a heavy commitment for them."
Mr.
Leblanc is currently seeking to sell all or part of the team,
and he said he has two parties that have expressed an interest
in keeping the team on Manitoulin, as well as had off-Island
inquiries.
"I don't
want to see the team leave the Island," he said. "I'm not
interested in that. Parry Sound wants to get a Junior A team
back; there are other communities that would like to have a
Junior A team. I want to see it stay here."
To
anyone conscientiously researching the team's finances,
particularly when viewing leaked financial documents indicating
the financial liability the team's owners are currently exposed
to, one thing is abundantly clear: they aren't into it for the
money.
Island
hockey fans will have an opportunity to come out and support the
team in Little Current at an upcoming back-to-back Wild series
called the Chi-Buck Cup, when they play against intense rivals,
the North Bay Skyhawks, on December 17 and 18. The last
encounter with North Bay resulted in a tight one-goal game and a
fight-filled third period.
Northeast
Town
quotes $20/ft.
for
purchase of
lakeside
roads
by
Lindsay Kelly
MANITOULIN-The Town of Northeastern Manitoulin and the Islands
is considering selling its shoreline road allowances, and if
you're a waterfront property owner, the town wants to hear from
you.
At a
December 1 meeting, Northeast council passed a motion that would
allow them to survey owners of waterfront property in the
municipality to determine their interest in acquiring the
shoreline road allowances in front of their properties, at a
proposed market price of $20 per foot, plus legal costs and
survey fees.
Mayor Joe
Chapman indicated that, at the last public meeting regarding
shoreline road allowances, there did seem to be interest from
members of the public in purchasing the land, but felt council
should ensure that interest in a more formal manner before
taking the next step in selling it.
"Before
we embark on it (selling the properties) I think we should
conduct another survey to see, is there much interest in it," he
said. "If not, then we won't continue with it, but if there is,
then we will look into it."
Mayor
Chapman also noted that the cost of $20 per foot was not an
exact figure, but one put in place to give council something
about which they could debate.
"It
could be more, it could be less," he remarked, adding that if
the town were to send out a survey without stating a price, it
might return an inaccurate estimate of how many people were
actually interested in buying their shoreline road allowances.
Council
came to the $20 per foot cost estimate based on research into
about 10 similar types of properties across southern Ontario,
including those on Lakes Joseph and Rosseau in Muskoka. That
estimate is low, however, and $30 per foot is closer to the
median, Mayor Chapman pointed out.
Councillor
Jim Stringer voiced his concerns over the proposed procedure.
Primarily, he felt that residents needed to be aware of the
additional legal and surveying fees, as well as the
administration fees and any additional fees the town added to
that figure. He also felt $20 per foot was too low an estimate,
and based on market values, the cost would probably be twice as
much.
"At the
same time, people need to be aware of Custodial Care Bylaw:
2003-46," he continued. "Anyone who owns the property has to
take custodial care of the abiding shoreline road allowances."
This means
shoreline road allowance owners would have to monitor the
property for fires, picnicking, camping, littering and prevent
any other behaviour or actions that degrade the property in any
way. Councillor Stringer felt a copy of the bylaw should be
attached to the survey when mailed out to residents, so they
could be "apprised of that."
A few
councillors said they would support the motion, as long as
changes were made before it was passed, one change being the
exclusion of the phrase "market price" from the motion. Council
argued that the market price was not applicable to what the town
wanted to sell it for, because the only party entitled to
purchase a shoreline road allowance is the resident who lives on
the adjacent waterfront property.
But
rather than keep debating the issue, a vote had to be taken
first on whether or not residents would be surveyed.
"We've
already spent a lot of time debating this," Councillor Sam Nardi
said simply. "We need to find out if anyone is interested in
this thing."
In a
recorded vote, Councillors Koehler and Stringer voted against
the motion, while Mayor Chapman and the remaining council
members voted for it. |