|
Great Lakes water levels
Go
up,Go down and IJC's Upper Lakes group
rules out immediate remediation of problems at St. Clair River
by
Michael Erskine
LITTLE CURRENT-International Upper Great Lakes Study (IUGLS)
co-chair Kay Felt could have been paraphrasing the late Island
environmental champion and defender of the North Channel Barney
Turner when she described the curious inverse relationship
between the formation of water level study groups and the
release of their reports.
"Water levels go up and water levels go down-and it is always a
big deal," said Mr. Turner in his last interview on lake levels
with the Expositor.
Ms.
Felt, the US co-chair of a group struck by the International
Joint Commission to study the water levels of the upper Great
Lakes, noted that the group was formed in response to low water
levels, but those levels appear to have reached their nadir and
are returning to levels closer if not above chart datum
averages. She pointed out that the previous study had been
formed at a time when lake levels had reached critically high
levels and many lakeside homes were in danger of falling into
the water due to high water erosion of waterfront bluffs.
That
is not to suggest that the study group is not taking the
possibility of long-term changes in water levels into account,
or that they have not found anything disturbing in measured
trends. Or, for that matter, might not be a new paradigm facing
those investigating which way the water flows.
"A
year ago talk about climate change caused heads to wag," said
Ms. Felt. "I think we can no longer ignore the impact of climate
change."
Although the study group is not ignoring climate change, per se,
the group's scientists (which include Jim Bruce, the only
Canadian among the group of environment scientists which picked
up a Nobel prize recently in Norway) admit embarrassment in only
having one station measuring evaporation and climate on water
levels in the Great Lakes. This despite recognizing that
evaporation from the Great Lakes is hands down the largest
single removal of water from those bodies-far dwarfing that used
by human consumption or diverted through man-made or natural
outflows. Evaporation is estimated at 116 billion gallons daily
(roughly the entire outflow of the St. Clair River), while
consumption use is approximately 4.2 billion gallons. The
evaporation numbers are wildly rough, however, being plus or
minus a mind-numbing 20 percent.
Measuring the inflow, and outflow, and subtracting one from the
other, is how the scientists currently calculate estimates of
water evaporation. Within those calculations lie a world of
black-box assumptions and conjectures.
The
presenters came to Little Current for the two-hour Saturday
public information meeting as part of a multi-community tour-and
they were under tight constraints to make it to the Parry Sound
meeting by 3 pm.
Despite this, the presenters held off starting the meeting for
nearly half an hour to allow more people to fill in the seats.
Dr. Bruce (who is also the Canadian co-chair of the study) and
emcee Doug Cuddy, had to leave early in order to ensure that at
least some of the members arrived in Parry Sound on time. Dr.
Bruce and Ms. Felt are alternating presenting the study, in part
to facilitate the leapfrogging schedule.
Mr.
Cuddy is a member of the IUGLS Interest Advisory Group and
represents the Lake Superior Conservancy and Watershed Council.
Scientist Dr. Syed Moin is the Canadian co-manager of the IUGLS
and it was he who delivered the scientific explanation of the
study.
The
study has four key components: determining how water level
changes affect resource groups including the environment;
developing improved knowledge of hydrologic and hydraulic
processes of the Great Lakes system under the current climate
regime; considering climate change; and involving governments,
industry, academia, Native Americans/First Nations and the
public.
The
study has two main objectives: to investigate the St. Clair
River flow and to investigate the whether the current Lake
Superior outflow management procedures could be improved
considering the evolving upper Great Lakes interests and climate
change. The group will make recommendations to the International
Joint Commission on changes and actions that may be necessary.
The
Public Interest Avisory Group (PAIG) gives the public the
opportunity to provide input to the study regarding values
associated with different Great Lakes water levels. It provides
a vehicle for the study to provide information to the public. It
advises study on outreach and communications. It advises study
on broad directions of work and it allows the study to benefit
from the experience and expertise of PAIG members.
The
good news found so far by the study is that water levels are up
and that water supplies to all the Great Lakes are above
average. Michigan and Huron are 22 cm above last year, while
Superior is 42 cm above last year and a whopping 24 cm above
chart datum. Water flows into Michigan-Huron from Superior will
have jumped by about eight percent over the amount that flowed
in July. Michigan-Huron, however, remains 32 cm below the
beginning of the month average from 1918 to 2007.
The
preliminary study conclusions suggest that changes in
Lake Huron
water levels are due in part to both inceased St. Clair River
conveyance (more water heading south) and changes in the net
basin supply, especially as a result of evaporation. The study
has not yet been peer-reviewed and other factors, which could be
playing a role, are still being investigated. The initial
findings suggest that doing anything immediately about water
levels (phrased as immediate mitigation) would be premature and
not within the current mandate of the five-year study.
The
Grand Canal project raised its head at this point in the
meeting, with the subject of further arctic water diversions
dismissed by all parties present as being undesirable.
The
remaining few minutes of the public meeting were given over to
the public to point out if the study was missing any critical
information.
The
main suggestion coming from one audience member was to do a
cross analysis of the water levels of all of the lakes across
North America to help determine if the Great Lakes system was
performing differently from the North American water systems as
a whole-an approach Dr. Moin said he would bring back to the
team.
Another suggestion was to investigate the impact of farmers'
irrigation on the system. That suggestion drew a heated retort
from another audience member who asserted that farmers are among
the most conscientious stewards of the watershed.
Ms.
Felt noted that competing and divergent interests are part of
the balancing act that must be performed when dealing with the
question of Great Lakes water levels.
Most
of the other suggestions were already being dealt with within
the 60-odd multifarious studies being conducted as part of the
$4.5 million, five-year investigation.
Ferry rates get mid-season hike of 10%
2008 budget skewed by high fuel prices, lower ridership
by
Jim Moodie
MANITOULIN-As of this past Friday, passengers were paying 10
percent more to board the Chi-Cheemaun ferry, but that's a
modest hike next to what the company has been losing due to
higher costs and fewer riders.
"We're not trying to completely recover our lost revenue," noted
Ian Dean of the Owen Sound Transportation Company (OSTC), which
operates the ferry on behalf of the Ministry of Northern
Development and Mines (MNDM). "We're trying to cover some of our
expenses but at the same time not scare away customers, who have
the option of driving around."
Fares
went up 10 percent for all passengers, although prices in the
cafeteria and gift shop have remained static, said Mr. Dean. As
well, the priority-passage booking fee of $20 and dinner cruise
tickets, at $46.95 per person, have not changed.
The
increase means that the cost for a standard-size car, not
including driver or passengers, will now be $34.70 instead of
$31.55. For a car carrying two people, the increase amounts to
just over $6, noted Mr. Dean.
Like
many businesses, the ferry service has struggled this year with
the impact of higher fuel costs, which both deter people from
travelling and add significantly the OSTC's diesel bill. But Mr.
Dean stressed that the mid-season fare hike "is not a fuel
surcharge;" had the company planned to offset its fuel expenses,
the increase in fares "would have been much higher."
Gary
Brown, a member of the OSTC board and a resident of the
South Baymouth
terminus community, agreed. "Ten percent doesn't come close to
covering the cost of fuel," he said. "We had a 50 percent
increase in fuel costs."
Mr.
Brown regrets the higher cost to passengers but hopes the impact
on tourism will be minimal. "It might have some deterrent as far
as whether people take the boat or drive around, but I think the
ones who are coming are coming anyway," he mused. "We had to do
something to cover off some of our costs and I think this is the
best resolution for everyone involved."
Traffic aboard the Chi-Cheemaun has declined by 9 percent this
summer, said Mr. Dean, and he doesn't expect passenger numbers
to climb much, if at all, over the remainder of the season. "I
don't think we're going to gain any traffic in the fall."
But
the 10 percent increase isn't directly related to that 9 percent
dip in ridership, the OSTC marketing director said. "It's more
to offset our expenses than make up for lost revenue."
The
ferry company has taken a number of steps to reduce its costs
this season, including a decision to run on just two of the
ship's four engines and alter its course to save on gas. This
has resulted in a slightly longer crossing but had no impact on
the departure times, in part because the decrease in vehicles
has made for quicker turnaround times at the docks, noted Mr.
Dean.
But
even with the savings reaped through these adjustments, the ship
is still taking a substantial hit, particularly since fares for
this season were set before the spike in gas prices could be
anticipated.
The
OSTC board considered a number of scenarios before making a
recommendation to the MNDM, which subsidizes the ferry service
as well as has the final say in changes to its schedule or fare
structure. "We looked at different options, and at this stage of
the season felt this was the most acceptable and practical,"
said Mr. Dean.
Al
Douglas, chair of the Manitoulin Tourism Association (MTA)
board, isn't thrilled that visitors will have to pay more to
reach Manitoulin by water, but is pleased that the increase
isn't exorbitant. "It's nothing that huge, so based on that I
don't think it will keep people from taking the ferry," he
surmised.
Many
people have already made reservations for both the ferry and
accommodations on Manitoulin, Mr. Douglas added, so are unlikely
to scratch their travel plans at this point.
The
downturn in the US economy and steep price at the pumps have
certainly had some impact on the Island's tourist operators and
seasonal businesses, yet Mr. Douglas believes the situation is
not as dire as some might suggest.
"I
just came from the (welcome centre) and it's been unbelievably
busy in the booth," he noted. "We had a bit of a slow start in
July but by the civic holiday weekend all of the campsites and
accommodations on the Island
were filled. Tourism is still very much alive and well from what
I can tell."
Accommodations in South Baymouth are a bit more vulnerable to
changes in ferry patterns, however, and Mr. Brown fears for
their viability if traffic remains slow on the Chi-Cheemaun.
"Most of the motels here rely on the boat traffic," he said. "If
the boat's hurting, they're hurting."
Still, Mr. Brown believes "we have to stay upbeat." Manitoulin
remains "a great place to come to," he said, and "hopefully if
the price of fuel drops a bit more, and we get a month of busy
sailing, maybe we can come close to our budget."
With
traffic down, particularly on the late crossing from Manitoulin
to Tobermory, the board had earlier considered the possibility
that one of the four daily sailings might have to be scrapped.
For Mr. Brown, a 10-percent fare hike is more palatable than the
loss of a crossing-or of the service altogether. "It's better
than no ship," he said.
Ferries in other parts of the country have introduced fuel
surcharges to compensate for the increase to their operating
costs, noted Mr. Dean. "The larger ferries on either side of
Canada have had at least one surcharge of about 15 percent," he
pointed out.
The
OSTC could go that route in the future, said Mr. Dean, but this
will be a discussion to have later. "We'll look long and hard at
all the factors after this season is done," he said.
St. Denis's 'Peacekeeper Day' inaugurated
by
Michael Erskine
OTTAWA-We Canadians are justly proud of our international role
as peacekeepers and the pivotal role played by the then not-yet
Prime Minister and Nobel Peace Prize winner Lester B. Pearson in
the gestation and birth of the United Nations peacekeeping
role-and this past weekend bore witness to the first observance
of a Nation Peacekeepers' Day.
Algoma-Manitoulin-Kapuskasing MP Brent St. Denis was in
Ottawa
for that first observance, and he had a special reason to stand
tall at the observances, as it was his private member's bill
that established National Peacekeepers' Day last June.
"I am
pleased to attend this event that recognizes members of the
Canadian Forces, RCMP, the police forces and members of the
diplomatic corps and civilians who support security and peace,"
said Mr. St. Denis.
Mr.
St. Denis refused to take full credit for the establishment of
National Peacekeepers' Day, however, giving credit to one of his
constituents for bringing the idea forward. "I want to
acknowledge Robert Manuel of Elliot Lake who brought this
initiative forward," he said. "Because of the hard work and
bipartisanship of my colleagues in the House of Commons and in
the Senate, Canada's peacekeepers and those who believe in the
fundamentals of peacekeeping, will have a special day in their
honour and their sacrifices for peace will never be forgotten.
The message it sends about peace and peacekeeping is strong and
I am proud that my colleagues from all political parties agree."
Mr.
St. Denis also expressed his thanks to Senator Art Eggleton and
veterans' organizations who appeared before both the House of
Commons and Senate committees to provide input and support for
the day of recognition.
August 9 was chosen as the day to observe National Peacekeepers'
Day because it was on that date in 1974 that nine Canadian
peacekeepers lost their lives when the plane they were
travelling on from Beirut to Damascus was shot down by a
surface-to-air missile. Mr. St. Denis pointed out that since
then, 164 Canadian peacekeepers have lost their lives while
keeping the peace around the world in over 66 nations.
Internet debate around Canada's recent peacekeeping efforts has
tended to focus strictly on the military contribution to
peacekeeping efforts, but Mr. St. Denis noted that focus on the
efforts of only the military does a disservice to the efforts of
diplomats and non-military personnel who also contribute to the
cause of keeping peace in the world.
"The
Right Honourable Lester B. Pearson won a Nobel Peace Prize for
proposing the first United Nations peacekeeping mission," noted
Mr. St. Denis. "Since then our brave men and women in the armed
forces and many non-military citizens have helped keep peace
around the world-and they deserve recognition for it."
The
role of peacekeeper has changed considerably since the days of
the 1956 Suez Crisis and the first UN peacekeeping missions to
the Middle East
proposed by Mr. Pearson and his colleagues at the then
still-nascent UN. Since the end of the cold war, UN peacekeeping
efforts have become more complex and are now more likely to
stand between warring factions within states than between
warring states.
Mr.
St. Denis spent the day following National Peacekeepers' Day
visiting the final resting place of Mr. Pearson at the Mclaren
Cemetary, in Wakefield, Quebec. "This day was also a tribute to
him," said Mr. St. Denis of the man who did as much as anyone to
create the modern international self-perception of Canadians.
EDITORIAL
Country Fest fans prove organizers on winning track
The
final song of the final set at last weekend's Manitoulin Country
Fest in Little Current was a special encore number that Canadian
country great George
Canyon dedicated to
the few hundred fans who still stood in pouring rain at
10:30 pm, listening to the
music.
"You're a great audience," he called out, "to still be here in
the rain!"
Such
was the spirit of the event-the second annual one-that filled up
local resorts and campgrounds and brought a whole lot of
"musical tourists" into the area.
Coincidentally, the weekend that Manitoulin Country Fest
organizers Craig and Kelly Timmermans have chosen for last
year's and this year's events is the same one that finds
Shelburne, in Dufferin County near Orangeville in southern
Ontario, awash with country music fans visiting that community
to attend the Canadian Fiddling Championships that have given
Shelburne the nickname "Fiddleville."
Granted, Shelburne has been building on this tradition for over
50 years, but the legacy of the Canadian Fiddling Championships
is impressive, including a large auditorium that is, of course,
used by the community for other events throughout the year.
The
Manitoulin Country Fest impresarios are clearly on the right
track and the new faces that appeared in downtown Little Current
on Friday and Saturday are certainly an indication of this fact,
together with the benefit to the hospitality and retail sectors.
The
Manitoulin Country Fest was also a fundraising opportunity for
the Manitoulin Islanders Junior 'A' team, the Little Current
Lions Club and the local branch of the Royal Canadian Legion, as
all of these organizations operated food or beverage
concessions.
This
is a fledgling event and it will no doubt be shaped and refined
over the years to come. But judging by the enthusiasm of those
fans who, as George
Canyon pointed out,
braved the rains to hear the music, there is a solid base of
support.
Kudos
to the organizers for bringing Manitoulin a new event. They can
certainly look to the success of the Canadian Fiddling
Championships in Shelburne and the dramatic effects that this
sustained event has had on that community over the years.
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
Residents should demand answers to water rate increase
Time is ripe to form ratepayer association to demand action
To
the Expositor:
No
matter where one goes in Manitowaning these days the increase in
water usage rates is bound to pop up in the conversation. It
seems that the majority of residents are amazed and mystified
that they are seemingly underwriting a portion of the usage fees
for the residents of Sunsite Estates. However, this generosity
of usually such benevolent souls does not appear to be sitting
well. According to the article in the Expositor ("Assiginack
opts for temporary levy to finance costs of new water plants,"
June 25), "numbers were crunched" and Sunsite rates were
lowered. Did this happen because Sunsite ratepayers were
organized and prepared while we trusting individuals in
Manitowaning were caught with our pants down? It would certainly
be nice if council would inform the residents of Manitowaning of
exactly how much number crunching increased our rates.
Perhaps the time is ripe for Manitowaning ratepayers to form our
own association, become organized, prepared and ready to demand
answers to questions that affect every property owner. Issues
like this certainly do not unite but divide communities.
Yes,
a committee is being struck to look at ways to "equalize"
payments. Unfortunately these are two very separate systems, and
in reality two communities. One is smaller than the other, and
therefore has fewer people to share the costs. Sorry, but it's a
fact of life, and the only way to lower Sunsite's rates is to
raise Manitowaning's. Now just why in the world would we
Manitowaningites be so generous? Oh, only on Manitoulin you say!
David
Smith
Manitowaning
Writer debates divine source of Anishinabek claim to the land
Writer disputes chief's assertion of a divine source for
Anishinabek
To
the Expositor:
As
published in the August 6 Manitoulin Expositor, "Chiefs call for
use of Anishinabek over Aboriginal as proper term for their
people," Patrick Madahbee wants Indians to be known as the
"original people the creator placed on this land."
The
Indians of the Americas came from near India-i.e.
Mongolia-China-by way of chasing game across the Bering Strait,
through the Americas to Chile, a few thousand years ago.
As to
a "creator" being involved, the only creator was hunger and the
necessity to survive. Wherever the game went that's where man
went. His economy was a hunting and fishing one.
As to
what level of caveman hunter existed on this part of our
approximately 500 million-year-old planet before the
Mongolian-Chinese arrived we do not know. What we do know is the
game today is made in China, once a public ownership economy
that's gone backwards to capitalism.
If
the markets of the Americas dry up as the cyclic capitalist
systems do, Mongolian Chinese will no longer be chasing American
game, i.e. dollars.
A
greater concern, Patrick, than our ancestry is stopping cavemen
capitalists and their god, money, destroying our planet and
rocketing to another to do the same.
The
arms industries of Krupp, Dupont and Mitsubishi are dependent on
cheap labour and kill the cheap labour for cheaper labour, and
unless the workers of the world unite to establish democracy-i.e.
public ownership-it won't matter what we are called. We won't be
here.
Two
essential books for all ages are Gulliver's Travels and Alice in
Wonderland. They support the giants on the heroes monument, at
2568 Highway 540, Little Current, Canada.
Douglas Campbell
Honora Bay
Youth protestors heroes for bringing attention to CAS situation
Silence ensures there is no accountability
To
the Expositor:
The
young men from Little Current are truly local heroes ("Kids plan
protest on friend's behalf at CAS office on Haweater Weekend,"
July 23) who touch the lives of every child close and far,
standing up to social injustices such as the Children's Aid
Society (CAS).
Sudbury-Manitoulin CAS executive director Collette Prevost's
answers to the media just prove how little the society actually
will admit to their wrongdoings: "It's complicated and we do not
expect children to understand." They are all too aware and they
do understand, you just got caught and proved by children that
there is so much abuse within a system designed to protect
children. The CAS keeps the secrecy so that there is no
accountability, but you got caught and these kids are wonderful
and amazing.
The
evidence they accumulated is mind-blowing. They inspire you to
be a better person and to continue advocating for children in
such a corrupt world. I believe that the CAS is only an
extension of the residential schools, again with protection of
the government to rob children and to abuse them in the name of
protection and what is best for them.
I
want to share one of my own personal heartbreaks. I had a young
mother come to me with her son a few years ago. She told me she
witnessed a sexual assault on her son by his father. She was
scared to death because of his threats against her and her son.
She ran with her son and came to stay with me and my family. She
was desperate for help and could not find it. Her son told me of
his assaults and how his daddy hurt him. I encouraged her to go
to the police. So I assisted her in telling her plight. She got
one door after another closed in her face. (I wish I could tell
you this is uncommon, but there have been numerous sexual
assaults brought to the attention of the Sudbury Regional Police
without charges laid against alleged pedophiles.)
This
is so important, because, for one, the officers in the sexual
assault division are not properly trained in interviewing
children for sexual assault, and the local police chief sits on
the board of the local CAS. This is not fair to victims of
domestic violence, and it is unethical at the least. Then CAS
ordered with a judge for the father to get visits. The boy told
the judge he was uncomfortable and said that he was not
comfortable with his father helping him after he went to the
washroom. When the mother reported it to the police, the CAS
came and took him and gave him to his father. It breaks my heart
to watch her in anguish. She sees her son two times a week now
for three hours (if the personal support workers show up on
time). The son repeatedly asks the workers for more time with
his mother, and states, "I want to come home with you mommy
forever." They punished her for speaking up.
It is
not your situation that gets justice, it's who you know. (I wish
this was only an isolated case, but it happens all too often to
be isolated.) And the perception that nice people don't rape
children is ludicrous. There are so many wolves out there in
sheep's clothing. The one thing that has not changed is that
there is still abuse of power, and our most precious members of
society are still being victimized by the very people who state
they are here to protect them. It is up to past victims of the
CAS and the police to come forward and launch class-action
suits. God bless and thank you for your time.
Tania
VanNorman
Webbwood
|