|
AOK
withdraws from partnership building new hotel in Little Current
Project now on
hold
by Michael
Erskine
AUNDECK OMNI
KANING-A plan by a local First Nation to build a "name brand"
hotel beside
Low
Island
Park
has come to a full stop, literally just minutes shy of signing
the final agreement which would have launched the deal.
In a statement
released by the Aundeck Omni Kaning band council, Chief Patrick
Madahbee indicated that the First Nation has been "pursuing the
development of a name brand hotel since 1998. It was agreed by
consensus of the chief and council that the hotel project be
terminated at this time due to the political and business
climate in (the Northeast Town), circumstances relating to
partnership conditions, and the high costs associated with this
project due to the delays with an OMB hearing."
Chief Madahbee
further indicated that: "The Aundeck Omni Kaning band council,
taking into consideration our community's best interest, have
decided to invest our financial resources for other projects
within our community."
In a
memorandum distributed to band members, chief and council
indicated that a demand by "our principal partner Jim McBane" to
change the partnership agreement-privately cited as a 20 percent
share for the developer and 80 percent retained by the band in
the original agreement-altered the profit-sharing formula to the
extent the band could no longer make a business case for its
members to move forward with the deal.
"It stopped
literally at the 59th minute," said band councillor Scott
Madahbee, who noted that the decision to halt the project caused
a great deal of disappointment among band membership, especially
for those who were looking forward to the jobs the project was
to provide. "We didn't take the decision lightly."
Mr. McBane had
his reasons for wanting to change the original agreement, said
Mr. Madahbee, but the band council did not agree with those
reasons, declining to go into detail. Mr. McBane also declined
to comment on the disagreement, noting that the arrangement was
a private business relationship and not a public matter.
Although Mr.
McBane said he has "other irons in the fire" regarding the
property at
Low
Island,
he declined to elaborate at this time.
The hotel
development was a matter of controversy in Little Current a
couple of years ago, when Mr. McBane requested a zoning change
to a commercial designation to allow the development to go
forward. Opposed by the Northeast Town council, Mr. McBane
appealed the matter to the Ontario Municipal Board, at a cost he
once pegged at nearly $50,000, and won the zoning change. That
zoning change remains in place, despite the failure of the AOK
hotel project, but as it was site-specific to the hotel
development, there could be some question as to how useful the
zoning change remains.
The cost of
the project to date, with environmental assessments and testing,
planning and design, has been touted to have been in the
million-dollar range. Sources say funding for the project was
being held in place by government agencies, despite the expiry
of the original funding programs. Since those programs no longer
exist, restarting the project once the band council resolution
officially declared the project dead would be impossible.
Building the
hotel on band property was also not an option, as the band's
current sewer and water infrastructure could not have supported
both the hotel's requirements and much-needed community housing
expansion.
Councillor
Madahbee said that although he had misgivings about the project
when first elected to council, he had since come around to
supporting the initiative because of the popularity of the
project within the community and the promise of long-term
employment and economic development for the band.
"There was an
agreement in place, put there by a previous council, but it was
also felt that agreement should be honoured," said Mr. Madahbee.
A letter
outlining Mr. McBane's changed position was apparently received
by the band early last week, and followed by a band council
meeting on Wednesday where the issue was discussed. A conference
call with the developer during the meeting failed to resolve the
issues separating the partners and by unanimous consensus of
chief and council the project was dropped.
"Frankly, I'm
not surprised," said Northeast Town Mayor Joe Chapman, an
outspoken critic of the hotel development since its inception.
"I have said all along that it was a good project in a bad
location."
Mayor Chapman
suggested that the Northeast Town would be interested in looking
at a other projects with the band-albeit in a different
location. "I think that, had the (hotel) project been in a
different location, it would have received broad community
support," he said. "We have some good property in town, such as
up beside the tourist information booth, that would be ideal for
a development project. We are willing to look at any proposal."
Although the
decision to kill the hotel project has been a heavy hit to
community morale in the AOK community, with a tremendous output
of effort by both senior government civil servants and band
economic development personnel now seemingly for naught, band
councillors note that there are other projects on the planning
boards and that they remain undaunted.
"It's a hard
thing to say, but now we have freed up the band's resources to
look at some other things that show promise," said Mr. Madahbee
philosophically. "Some other band councils might have caved in
and gone ahead anyway, but we felt strongly that it was not in
the interests of our membership to go ahead with the deal. We
were prepared to go ahead with the original agreement."
OPP lay
charges against
murder
suspect's father
by Michael
Erskine
GORE BAY-In a
bizarre twist to the story of Brent Jeremy Kells, the
21-year-old Zhiibaahaasing man charged with first degree murder
in the shooting death of 25-year-old Maryann Davis, his father,
Robert William Kells has been charged with one count of
obstructing justice and as an accessory after the fact to
murder.
The elder Mr.
Kells was released after appearing in Gore Bay Superior court,
after sureties were placed by his wife, Zhiibaahaasing First
Nation Chief Irene Kells and her daughter.
According to
public records cited on April 21 by the Expositor's sister
publication, the Manitoulin West Recorder, police allege that
the elder Kells, knowing that his son had killed Ms. Davis,
burnt his son's clothing, and that he then tried to help his son
escape.
A preliminary
hearing for Brent Kells is scheduled to begin on Monday, June 5,
in Gore Bay.
'Bully' is a
bad word!
Part I of a
series
Behaviour
emotionally scars both victims and perpetrators
EDITOR'S NOTE:
This is the first installment of a series on the issues
surrounding bullying in the schools, its impacts on both bullies
and their victims, and what parents can do to help their
children.
by Michael
Erskine
MANITOULIN-Parents often view bullying in the school yard as a
rite of passage, one that would be as familiar to the parents of
Plato and Socrates as it is to Tammy Albers, a concerned Little
Current parent who recently delivered her comments on the issue
to a provincial taskforce in Sudbury examining the issue. But
the phenomenon has been growing at such an alarming rate that it
has been described as an epidemic hitting North American
schools.
Bullying
certainly seems to be on the rise, or perhaps it is just that
our zero tolerance of violence in the schools has made parents
and educators more sensitized to its presence.
No person
familiar with the evening news can escape the conclusion that
with a culture and mass media seemingly obsessed with 'Die Hard'
reactions to every injustice, the toll of bullying can be as
deadly on the perpetrator as it is on his or her victim. In the
horrid anti-logic of revenge violence, there need not even be a
direct link between the bully and a victim's retribution.
In 1999 a
14-year-old
Taber,
Alberta
student shocked the nation as he reacted to years of bullying
and ostracism by gunning down two 17-year-olds he didn't even
know in revenge. More common, however, are cases like that of a
14-year-old British Columbia girl who had endured incessant
bullying and saw suicide as her only way out, just as the new
millennia had barely dawned. She took her life in November,
2000, bewildering her parents and the friends who thought they
knew her.
The price of
bullying can be steep. Health outcomes can include anxiety,
insecurity, distress, depression, poor academic performance,
insomnia, nightmares, loss of appetite, cramps, irritability,
passivity, shyness, withdrawal, (oddly enough) aggression and a
pattern that can continue on into sexual harassment and
victimization.
Making things
even more difficult is the fact that bullying can be a nasty
little secret that children chose not to share with those who
can help them because they believe it will only get worse.
A report
compiled by the Kids Help Phone Foundation noted that children
are being bullied at ever-diminishing ages-and that the impacts
extend well into adulthood. The victims are often children whose
differences from the societal norm-such as being new in the
neighbourhood, having different philosophies or cultures, or
being better at sports or perhaps having superior scholastic
skills-make them targets of those who prey.
While violence
grabs most of the attention shone on the issue of bullying by
the media, verbal abuse is actually the most common form of
bullying. Violence still tends to be largely a boy's
domain-girls more often use more covert forms of bullying such
as social ostracism-but recent trends show an increase in
violence among young women that promises to remove that gender
gap as time goes on.
Whatever form
bullying takes, it often holds its victims in thrall for
extended periods of time, sometimes lasting for years.
Intervention
by school officials and better communication of bullying issues
have been cited by children themselves as actions they would
like to see implemented to deal with the issue-and it was in
this vein that Ms. Albers' comments were directed.
"I asked why
elementary schools do not have guidance councillors," she said.
Councillors in the schools whose mandate is to deal with
societal issues could help nip bullying in the bud and go a long
way toward helping children who bully deal with the issues that
encourage their behaviours. "There are 18,000 children who are
bullied every day in Ontario, including over 1,300 elementary
school students. It's a very serious issue."
Ms. Albers
lays part of the blame on parents who do not give teachers the
support they need to deal with behavioural problems.
"Parents have
to lighten up on teachers," she said. "We, as parents, used to
respect teachers and we taught our children to react to them as
they would our own authority."
The tendency
now is to immediately take the child's side-and that can often
be a critical mistake.
Children who
bully are often remarkably adept at manipulating adults, and one
of the key elements in problem bullying is the 'blame the
victim' defence often adopted by bullies. Although it was once
believed that bullying behaviour signalled a lack of
self-esteem, recent research has shown that not to be the case.
Bullies often have high levels of self-esteem-it is their
victims who tend to be less sure of themselves and to lack
social networks and supports provided by friends.
Bullies are
often difficult to spot. Violent activities often take place
where supervision is less pervasive, such as recess in the
school playground, and are often carried out by proxies, goaded
on by an instigator who remains aloof from the actions
themselves and thus escapes retribution.
The bully's
motivation is often to exercise power and control over their
victim, and they are often found to be acting out of
powerlessness in some other facet of their lives, such as their
home life. They usually target those they see as being
different, sometimes even superior, to themselves.
Since some
children-especially, it has been found, those with
attention-deficit issues-may strike out at those who are
bullying them, they can be misidentified as the instigators,
rather than the victims, of bullying episodes.
Those who are
most likely to be victims, however, are those to whom violence
is not seen as a legitimate reaction.
In the
articles during the following weeks, we will explore how to
identify your child as a victim, or perpetrator, of bullying and
what programs are in place in the schools to help deal with the
issue, in either case, as well as what parents can do to help.
EDITORIAL
We should heed
the Hurricane's message
Our world is
beset by frightening forces of who seek to employ weapons whose
destructive potential approaches, quite literally, biblical
proportions, against defenseless and innocent people.
Terrorists
have shaken our complacent society to its very core, murdering
thousands of innocents and threatening to carry death and
destruction to millions more-usually invoking the will and
mission of God almighty.
But the
greater threat facing us all, the threat which is creeping in
the back door while we cringe in anticipation of a turbaned
bogeyman crouching in the cave's shadows beyond our porch
lights, is the loss of those rights and freedoms for which our
ancestors have given their life's blood on a thousand
battlefields to win and defend.
Dr. Reuben
'Hurricane' Carter, the civil rights icon who brought a message
of defiant hope to the VCARs conference in M'Chigeeng last week,
is a man who knows first hand what it means to stand naked
before the unbridled might of the state, and the dangers
contained in the current willingness of North American society
to surrender its precious rights and freedoms.
Stripped of
his inalienable rights by a system blinded through prejudice and
racism, those rights and freedoms yet remained as tools that
would eventually allow Dr. Carter to be rescued from his
wrongful imprisonment-in his extraordinary case, justice
prevailed.
For millions
across the globe who are blessed with less luck or whose
defenders are less adamant, the fairy-tale ending currently
unfolding for Dr. Carter in the winter of his life will never
come-justice is rarely perfect in our all-too-human world-but
that does not mean that we should not strive with all our might
for justice, truth and freedom.
There is a
devil's price to pay for those rights and freedoms, and that
price includes some of the guilty going unpunished, if we are to
protect the innocent from injustice.
We must accept
that innocent people will continue to be cut down by those who
seek to destroy our way of life, no matter how Orwellian our
system becomes. It is a rice we must resign ourselves to accept
if we are not to fall back into the type of tyranny that history
teaches us has always led civilization into a dark age.
B.F. Skinner
posited more than a generation ago that modern society can no
longer afford freedom and dignity and that the machine will
someday soon impose a new, ordered world upon human society, an
order where security and safety of the herd is imposed through
consensual social tyranny. He believed that such an order will
inevitably take the place of our outdated democratic anarchy,
and the freedom of the individual to live life largely free from
the interference of the state will end.
B.F. Skinner
obviously never met the likes of the Hurricane.
LETTERS TO THE
EDITOR
Strike has
been bad all around for
Island
Perhaps a new
council could do a better job
To the
Expositor:
This
disagreement has outlasted its usefulness!
The loss of
the trade show will probably impact the economy of the Northeast
Town by some $2 million and the spinoff to the rest of the
Island by about the same. Then you have the long-term effects which could
disrupt the usual activities of the
Island during the balance of 2006.
To put in
plain English, it is bad all around for the Manitoulin.
Personally, if I were in some of the individuals' shoes who
could make things happen, I would be most uncomfortable. After
the next election the area could see a whole new council.
Perhaps a new council could do a better job at managing the
affairs of the community. That would be better for the
Manitoulin in general and the whole economy across the area.
Angus (D.A.)
Dunlop
Letters can
also be dropped through the slot on the front door of the
Expositor office.Send
your Dear Dave letters to Box 369, Little Current, Ontario, P0P
1K0,
|