|
Cormorant summit set for April 27
by Jim Moodie
MANITOULIN-Islanders will soon have a chance to hear the
Ministry of Natural Resources' side of the cormorant story, and
pose what are sure to be a few pointed questions, all prior to
the illegal cull planned for the Victoria Day weekend.
"Manitoulin
residents are invited to attend a public information meeting on
April 27 at Manitoulin Secondary School (from 7 to 10 pm) to
learn more about Ontario's cormorant research and experimental
control program," a release issued last week by the ministry
states.
Whether the
information that the MNR shares at this meeting will be enough
to head off the illegal cull remains to be seen. If it isn't,
though, the ministry is being clear about its position on the
action of civil disobedience.
"Anyone who
harasses or kills cormorants may be arrested and charged,"
related MNR communications specialist Don Mark last week. "It is
the mandate of this ministry to uphold the laws as outlined in
the fish and game act."
Under the Fish
and Wildlife Conservation Act, cormorants are not considered
game species. And as the release from the MNR points out, "the
maximum fine for illegally harming or harassing cormorants is
$25,000, and violators could also face one year in jail, seizure
of equipment, and possible related charges under the Criminal
Code of Canada and the Firearms Act."
Members of the
United Fish and Game Clubs of Manitoulin (UFGCM) have been
complaining for months that results of a five-year study on
cormorants undertaken by the MNR have not been made public, and
they have been miffed that an earlier meeting with ministry
biologists slated for March was called off.
Asked why the
ministry had not yet released the study, Mr. Mark replied, "Some
findings have been released. For example, almost 40 percent of
known nesting sites have seen experimental egg-oiling. The
number of cormorants on Lake Huron Canadian waters has dropped
by 10,000 over the past three years."
Mr. Mark also
noted that "research and monitoring is continuing in a
multi-year program. Our information session at the Manitoulin
high school on April 27 will focus on results and planning."
Cormorant
numbers, based on the MNR's study of nesting sites, have
declined from 29,000 in the year 2000 to 19,000 in 2004, Mr.
Mark pointed out. "It has been a steady decline and scientists
expect the trend will continue. Again, that is why this is a
multi-year program."
While a cull
was authorized for Presqu'isle Provincial Park on Lake Ontario
near Belleville "because of the impact cormorants were having on
vegetation and identified species (such as egrets) at risk," Mr.
Mark gave no indication that a similar cull would be immediately
sanctioned for the
North Channel. He merely indicated that the devastation wrought at
Presqu'isle, where "one of the islands was turned into a virtual
moonscape...points out the need for this multi-year program of
research and monitoring to continue on Manitoulin and the
North Shore."
You can
already hear local fishermen groaning, "great, more studies,"
but the MNR is not apt to announce any drastic control measure
before it is confident there is the need. As Bruce Pollard,
senior avian biologist with the ministry, told Toronto's Now
Magazine in late March, "We are unwilling to intervene until
there is evidence of significant effects" on Lake Huron's fish
and other ecosystem elements. "It's a really complex issue, and
there are certainly polarized views on this."
The Now
Magazine article, titled "Killer flap on Leslie Spit," focusses
on the birds' impact in the
Toronto
area, but makes mention of the Manitoulin situation. "If the
government doesn't act, others say they will," it reads. "A
group called the United Fish and Game Clubs of Manitoulin says
it has more than 1,000 volunteers ready for their own
unsanctioned Victoria Day weekend cull, escalating the vigilante
raids that have brought fire and slaughter to a number of Great
Lakes colonies over the past decade."
The article is
far from an endorsement of such actions, however. While it airs
the concern of the Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters-as
expressed by OFAH representative Greg Farrant-that "when these
birds move in, they destroy everything in their path," it gives
equal space to the concerns of naturalists. Glen Coady, of the
Toronto Ornithological Club, speaks about earlier culls that
were carried out in the late 1940s, and the subsequent impact of
DDT, which decimated the cormorant population on the Great
Lakes, leaving just 10 nesting pairs by 1973.
"Basically,
the rebound of this bird is a good-news story," Mr. Coady tells
Now Magazine.
The article
notes that overfishing, along with the introduction of sea
lampreys, alewives and rainbow smelt, have contributed to the
decline in fish stocks and the rise in cormorant numbers. It
further points out that, as the number of alewives (and, by
extension, cormorants) has dwindled in recent years, the number
of native lake herring (or cisco) has rebounded.
Mr. Pollard
tells Now that "we don't think (the alewife collapse) is
attributable to cormorants. We think it's the other way around."
And the avian biologist adds that cormorants are likely running
out of ideal nesting sites. "It may be, like any species
occupying a new habitat, that after initial rapid growth, as
they fill up their new environment, they reach carrying
capacity."
Mr. Pollard
will be one of the MNR personnel present at the April 27 meeting
at Manitoulin Secondary, along with fisheries biologist Mark
Ridgeway, and several other scientists.
AOK cultural committee protests cut in powwow funding allocation
by Michael
Erskine
AUNDECK OMNI
KANING-A determined group of about 50 Aundeck Omni Kaning (AOK)
residents camped outside the band office last week to draw
attention to what they say is an inadequate level of funding for
the powwow committee, an assertion the current chief and council
dispute.
At the crux of
the issue is the amount of funding that has been allocated for
the powwow by the band's governing council. The committee had
requested that $20,000 be allocated to the event's budget, and
be continued for at least three years, but the council, say
organizers, only allocated $8,000.
"We had a
difficult time last year," said powwow co-chair Don McGregor. "A
lot of volunteer effort went into making that powwow a success.
A lot of volunteers came out to help build the new grounds. We
spent twice as much time on it last year that we usually do. It
was quite an effort because we all have jobs, other things to do
in our lives. We do it because we care."
Mr. McGregor
claimed the committee had called a community meeting to discuss
the issue, but that none of the current council deigned to show
up.
Chief Patrick
Madahbee said that he was disappointed in the route the
committee chose to take in resolving the funding issue.
"They gave us
less than two days notice of the meeting," said Chief Madahbee.
"I was in a meeting with the town of NEMI and our partners,
Streetwise Development, over the hotel site plan."
Other council
members also had commitments, he noted, and the issue calls for
a meeting with the entire council. The council had responded to
the powwow committee's demand for a community meeting in a
written letter outlining their position, added Chief Madahbee.
"We had a
council meeting on April 4 and we had a special meeting this
past Monday (April 11) and nobody brought this up," he said.
"Instead they chose to go this route."
Chief Madahbee
pointed out that the band council had recently leveraged over
$215,000 from various sources to support cultural projects and
initiatives in Aundeck Omni Kaning. That funding was directed
toward language programming, cultural revitalization, support
for a community drum group, the new powwow grounds, and the
annual powwow, as well as cultural enhancements to health and
social service programs. The council also supports a wide range
of sporting and homecoming events as well as a large number of
other activities.
Mr. McGregor
retorted that the language and cultural programs the chief cited
were short-term employment initiatives that have little or no
long-term viability once the government funding runs out.
In a signed
release entitled 'Setting the record straight,' the entire band
council endorsed the chief's stance.
"We provided
an annual contribution to the powwow," said Chief Madahbee, "but
we have also encouraged them to fundraise as well."
The band, he
notes, has provided additional support in the way of band
equipment and resources during the event.
"We have also
told the committee if they need additional support, we would
still assist with additional help, but we want them to fundraise
as well," said Chief Madahbee.
The powwow
committee came forward with a request for a substantial increase
in funding without providing a written budget or any
justification for the increased funding.
Mr. McGregor
pointed out that the band has $1 million in Casino Rama money,
funds the band receives as profit-sharing from a Native-run
casino located in Mnjikaning First Nation.
"We all
believe in economic development," said Mr. McGregor, "but you
can't ignore the cultural needs of the community and just put
everything into economic initiatives."
Other bands,
Mr. McGregor maintains, have given over part of the funds
received from Casino Rama to cultural enhancement projects like
the powwow.
Elder Ernest
McGraw delivered a prayer at the demonstration outside the band
offices calling for healing and reconciliation.
"I hope God
will open the hearts of the people," he said. "Stop this before
it is too late."
The elder
expressed dismay over what he perceived as a lack of action to
preserve the community's traditional way of life.
"It is not
right," he said. "It is not right with God and it is not right
with the community."
Mr. McGraw
also said he was unsettled that the band's resources were being
allocated strictly for the building of a new hotel in
Northeastern Manitoulin and the Islands. Some of those moneys,
he said, should be set aside to preserve the community's
heritage.
Cries of "it's
our money" could be heard thoughout the crowd, and that
sentiment was also to be seen on some of the signs being held
aloft during the demonstration.
Mr. McGraw
said he has been involved in band issues for over 40 years, he
said, adding that he has never been shy about taking a stance on
matters of concern to the community.
"Right now the
powwow is in jeopardy," he said. "The chief and council should
not be prejudiced against our own culture."
As a
solidarity pipe was passed from hand to hand in the circle, a
drum song rang out across the band council parking lot. Children
were very much in evidence, running about with oblivious abandon
during the peaceful demonstration.
The council's
statement on the matter was direct: "We also disapprove of the
disrespectful tactics used in seeking additional funding,
tactics such as misinformation being distributed to the
community, selective solicitation of households which does not
represent the total community, trespassing on private property,
personal harassment, disrupting key services to our membership,
involving young children in a hostile environment, causing undue
stress on our elders and creating general animosity in our
community." In bold type, the missive continues: "This is a very
disrespectful behaviour from a group which is supposed to be
promoting traditional values and beliefs."
In addition to
the band council's statement chastising the demonstrators for
their disrespectful approach to the issue, Chief Madahbee
ordered the band offices closed for the Friday afternoon because
of what he characterized as disruptive behaviour of some of the
demonstrators.
"They are
upsetting our staff, making them nervous," he said. "They
shouldn't have to put up with that sort of thing."
The organizers
of the event were critical of the closing of the band offices
and disruption of services. They alleged the decision was made
simply to discredit the demonstrators and to isolate people who
would normally come to the band offices for their cheques on
Friday afternoon.
"Most of our
employees get their pay cheques through direct deposit,"
countered Chief Madahbee, who was in Sudbury attending
previously-scheduled meetings during the protests on Friday.
The band
council, however, wasted little time in reacting to the
demonstrators' threat that there could possibly be no powwow
this year due to the funding issue.
"We will be
reassigning the hosting of this event to another group which has
come forward indicating an interest to organize the 2005
powwow," reads the band's statement. "We welcome anyone
interested in assisting with the organization of the powwow."
Community
members expressed mixed emotions about the demonstration. Some
spoke in support of the actions and expressed concern over the
band's current economic initiatives, while others expressed
dismay at the tactics being employed by one or the other or even
both sides in the issue. One resident even pointed out that this
is an election year in the community and suggested that the
motives behind the demonstrations could be as much political as
cultural. Others simply said they just did not want to get
involved on any side.
"Sitting on
the fence is a legitimate position in something like this," said
resident Matt Madahbee, who said he refused to be pulled into
the debate. "I don't get involved in the cultural stuff, but I
don't like seeing police cars swarming all over the place
either."
Final resolution possible in M'Chigeeng election drama
Community voting on custom election code
by Michael
Erskine
M'CHIGEENG-It
has been a four-year odyssey for the M'Chigeeng custom election
code, but that journey may be nearly complete.
Members of the
community had an opportunity to discuss the code during a
Saturday, April 16 meeting in the M'Chigeeng Community Centre
that was closed to the press. Chief Glen Hare and M'Chigeeng
lawyer Susan Hare held a press conference following the meeting.
The turnout
for the meeting was good, with over 120 people showing up for
the 10 am meeting to express their views, both in support and
against the new code.
The new code
is not perfect, said Chief Glen Hare, who noted there were
provisions in the code that he was not happy with, but the code
does address the concerns of Ministry of Indian Affairs and most
of the community's concerns as well.
The most
contentious part of the code is a provision that band employees
must take a leave of absence from their jobs if they wish run
for the position of band councillor. A band referendum
determined that most in the community do not want band employees
sitting on council while continuing in their jobs.
"I think it is
only common sense that you can't be your own boss," said Chief
Hare.
During the
meeting, Chief Hare went through the highlights of the code with
members of the community and tried to answer all of the
questions posed.
"You can never
please everyone," said Chief Hare, "but I think this is a good
place to start from."
Chief Hare
noted that the election code, although being presented to the
community for ratification, is not 'written in stone.'
"We can change
later to meet the needs of our community as we see fit," he
said. "It will be our code, not Indian Affairs'."
The code
provides a process to amend its provisions and will, if passed,
remain a working document to take the band's electoral process
into the 21st century. The code, and any subsequent amendments,
must be ratified through a vote by a majority of band members.
The next step
is a ratification vote by on and off-reserve band members. That
vote will be held on May 21 for on-reserve members and there is
a deadline of May 20 for off-reserve members to receive their
ballots. Off-reserve ballots will be accepted through the mail
until May 26, after which the ballot counting will begin.
The code sets
up the position of chief, supported by a council of 10
councillors, one of which (the one receiving highest number of
votes) will be declared deputy chief. Quorum required to conduct
meetings is set at six councillors. The chief casts the deciding
ballot in the case of a tie and presides over the council
meetings.
If there is a
tie for the position, it will be resolved first in favour of a
non-incumbent, then, if there is still a tie, the decision will
be made in favour of moving the council closer to a 50 percent
gender equality. If a tie still remains, the decision will then
be made by lot.
General
elections must be called at least six months before the
expiration of the term of office and must take place no later
than 30 days after the expiration of the term of office.
Chief Hare
said he felt there was a strong will in the community to put the
issue to rest and move on with the issues facing the community.
The code also
spells out policy on filling vacancies, appeals, and the powers
of the electoral committee.
As befits a
First Nation code, the preamble is written in the original
language of the people. "This will be our code," said Chief
Hare, "and the opening of our code is in Ojibwe, as it should
be."
Following a
ratification vote, the results are submitted to the Minister of
Indian and Northern Affairs, who will then arrange for an order
in council to remove M'Chigeeng from the Indian Act's election
rules. This process can take up to three months. The band hopes
to encourage the minister to speed up the process during a
meeting scheduled for May.
If the process
can be completed in time, the first election under the custom
code will take place in September.
Chief Hare
said he felt there was a strong will in the community to put the
issue of the band's election code to rest and move on with the
issues facing the community.
That sentiment
was echoed by band member Ron Ense as he left the community
meeting.
"Let's just
vote on this thing and get it over with," he said. "It's time to
move on."
Assiginack granted funding for coveted 'Health Team'
Physician, nurse practitioner and registered nurse
by Michael
Erskine
ASSIGINACK-You
would be hard put to wipe the grin off Assiginack Reeve Les
Field's face after Friday's announcement that her community
would be the site of a new Family Health Team.
"Isn't it
great!" enthused Reeve Fields. "This is going to mean so much
for our community."
"I am very
pleased that Assiginack is one of the first communities to be
chosen for a Family Health Team," said Algoma-Manitoulin MPP
Mike Brown in announcing the decision. "A Family Health Team is
exactly what Assiginack needs, it will ensure that more people
receive the health care they need closer to home."
The
announcement that Assiginack is one of the first communities to
garner a batch of 52 FHTs and three community FHTs approved by
the government is much more than just a huge improvement in the
health and well-being of the community, pointed out Reeve
Fields.
"We are
talking about providing stability and continuity," she said.
"With our new nurse practitioner living within the community,
along with a family doctor, nurse and support staff, we have the
basis for a strong professional health team that will serve the
needs for our community and serve as an anchor for other health
services in the community."
News that the
renovations for the community's health clinic will be receiving
funding have also provided a boost to the community's morale,
and with the inclusion of a full dental suite on the ground
floor of the clinic, Reeve Fields said she felt confident the
community may soon replace the loss of the community's dentist
in the past year.
The new clinic
will act as an anchor for the community's pharmacy as well, said
Reeve Fields, helping to retain vital services within the
community.
Family health
teams include doctors, nurses, nurse practitioners and other
health care professionals working together to provide
comprehensive care day and night, seven days a week. This
includes access by phone to a registered nurse.
"The
government has committed to making health care in Ontario more
responsive to the needs of individual communities," said MPP
Brown. "This commitment is very important for the North, where
communities are often separated by large distances and may have
very different needs."
Reeve Fields
said that she did not know why her community was picked to have
one of the first FHTs to be announced in the province, but she
certainly wasn't complaining.
"If community
support had an impact on the decision I could certainly
understand it," she said. "We also have a very good team, both
staff and on council, who have all been 100 percent behind this
initiative."
Earlier this
year the Township of Assiginack took the initiative in securing
health care for their community by announcing the unilateral
funding of their nurse practitioner program for a trial one-year
period.
EDITORIAL
An election
call today would smack of opportunism
The likelihood
of another federal election is rising alongside the electorate's
blood pressure with each passing day of testimony at the Gomery
inquiry into the sponsorship scandal in Quebec-but in an almost
perverse contradiction, the electorate is not the least bit
interested in going to the polls.
The temptation
to strike while the iron (or in this case public temper) is hot,
must be near to unbearable for Stephen Harper, leader of the
opposition and the only party likely to be able to form a
government after a spring trip to the polls.
The problems
associated with going to the polls are manifold, however, and it
is little wonder that Mr. Harper is dithering about forcing the
call.
The backlash
from a disgruntled electorate forced to the polls would almost
certainly put Mr. Harper in the driver's seat of an even more
unstable government than that currently tottering in Ottawa.
Looking at the
current numbers being reported by polling agencies, it is
plainly evident that the majority of voters remain left of
centre. Should Mr. Harper succeed only in bringing a minority
government back to Ottawa, he would face a coalition of Bloc MPs
who would dearly love to immediately re-topple the government,
thus proving Confederation does not work, along with a stronger
NDP contingent to whom Mr. Harper's core values are complete
anathema, and a Liberal rump eager to seek revenge at every
turn.
The collective
parliament should turn their minds away from short-term
political expediency and get back to what they were elected to
do: govern the country.
There are
bills to be made and bills to be paid, and the last thing we
need to do is place the government's business on hold, once
again, while the two big boys on the block duke it out yet
again. We did this already and we have made it plain that we
want it this way. Live with it.
Justice Gomery
will complete his investigation in due course. The culprits who
have broken the law will be charged-some might even be brought
to justice and made to pay for their foul deeds. Watergate, the
Canadian Pacific Railroad scandal, or any number of other
scandals that have, over time, provided a glimpse into the
sordid underbelly of politics, generally leave the public
retching in disgust-but, one of the real dangers here in this
point in our history is that most people no longer clearly
differentiate between political parties. Parties are all tarred
with the same black brush of corruption and (with the possible
exception of the Greens) they remain discredited in the eyes of
too many people, especially among younger voters, for the good
of our country. The danger may be that so many people stay away
from the polls in any snap election, that no matter who wins
they will not have a credible mandate.
It is time to
stick to the program, get some work done and let nature take its
course. Mr. Harper will win a strong measure of credibility for
not having taken an opportunistic shortcut to power and, with
familiarity and a strong parliamentary record, the public may
come to trust him enough to elect the Conservatives to power on
their own merit, rather than as a barely-palatable alternative
to a more-repulsive dish.
LETTERS TO
THE EDITOR
Cormorants fulfill important ecological role
Man has never taken the blame for anything!
To The
Expositor:
I know that as
soon as people read the word cormorant in the headlines they do
not read the rest of the story. Many of us are so sick and tired
of hearing about how we have to get rid of the cormorants.
Unfortunately, if you don't read these articles, you may not
know the asinine things that are happening. For example how do
you feel about having approx. 1000 people take the law into
their own hands by going out to shoot cormorants on May 24
weekend?
First of all,
do any of you read the facts about cormorants? It has been
stated that anglers are more apt to impact the fishery than
birds and any government measure to reduce cormorant populations
would be misguided and unfair. These birds have done nothing
except emerge from the verge of extinction. Cormorants are a
native species that fulfill an important ecological role. Exotic
species such as pacific salmon and alewives which have been
introduced to Lake Huron contribute to the boom in cormorants
and the decimation of native sports fish. There has been a 33
percent reduction in the cormorant population on Lake Huron
since 2000. The decline is partly because of the egg-oiling
initiative undertaken by the MNR, weather patterns, and a drop
in the number of alewives, the cormorants' favourite food
source.
Man has never
taken the blame for anything. Could the lack of fish be caused
by netting or the past limits of over 100 perch per day, per
person? Even though experts have said the cormorants eat less
than three percent of the sports fish, they are being blamed for
wiping out the fish population.
Now we are
going to have approximately 1000 people taking the law into
their own hands and shooting anything that flies during the May
24 weekend. There are a lot of us out there that are appalled
that a large group of people would take out their guns and start
shooting, and don't tell me it will only be cormorants. I can
see loons, hawks, crows, seagulls all being slaughtered. What
right do you have to take the law into your own hands? Yes,
there are good laws and bad laws but we have to obey them,
otherwise anarchy would abound. Do we want to live in a world
where we just do what we want to do, kill whatever or whoever we
feel deserves it? No! We have laws that must be obeyed and
hopefully through time and patience they will get changed.
I hope that
the police and the MNR will be out in full force the May 24
weekend doing their jobs.
Claire Cline
Spring Bay, ON
Funding options exist for Ojibwe immersion
Why not hire Ojibwe-speaking teachers?
To The
Expositor:
After reading
"M'Chigeeng parent group seeks Ojibwe school immersion program"
(April 13) I felt that I must respond.
When
M'Chigeeng took over education in the 1980s, I was an Education
Committee member and so I know what the original direction for
education in our community was. The first step we took was
training as an Anishnabe Education Committee and what that
meant, and one of the first things we were told was the
importance of language and culture and teaching the language to
our children. But even before the '80s, a group of parents
headed by Grace Fox, Melvina Corbiere, the late Mary Lou Fox and
the late Angie Debassige put Ojibwe immersion at Lakeview School
into several grades at the time. This group had no money from
Indian Affairs, but they persevered at their own personal
expense. Indian Affairs did fund French language at Lakeview. A
second wave of parents concerned with loss of language began the
N'ungosuk program in the mid-'80s for daycare age children and
did push for and receive Indian Affairs funding for three years.
So, now we have another group of parents on this honourable
quest of attempting to preserve our language.
Your newspaper
article says that "funding remains uncertain largely due to the
status of M'Chigeeng First Nation due to its custom election."
Does this mean that the Director of Education Dan Simon made an
application to Indian Affairs and Indian Affairs refused because
of the Custom Code? I would like to see that application and the
refusal letter. Otherwise, blame is being thrown around
recklessly. This parents group has been working in the community
on this for the last several years, so Education Director Dan
Simon (who is also a band councillor and chair of the band's
finance committee) has had ample time to solicit and receive
funding for this valuable program. As well, Indian Affairs is
not the only funder in the world. The N'ungosuk program in the
mid-80s got money from private foundations to begin their
immersion program.
I am quite
surprised at the statement by Principal Neil Debassige that
there are no teachers at Lakeview who speak the language! Our
first priority when we took over education was to hire
Ojibwe-speaking native teachers-some non-native teachers at
Lakeview at the time tried to tell us that that goal was racist.
Had succeeding Education Committees and principals maintained
the goal of hiring Ojibwe speaking native teachers, there would
be a surplus of Ojibwe-speaking native teachers at Lakeview now.
Neil
Debassige's other ramblings about problems with standardization,
oral versus a written language and different dialects, are only
diversions and obstacles. The answers to each of Principal
Debassige's problems have been previously discussed and
overcome.
Principal Neil
Debassige sounds lukewarm to immersion in even his most hopeful
statement that "what may happen is that we take steps towards
immersion." He wants to train the teachers to speak Ojibwe
first? Why not hire teachers who can speak Ojibwe? It is
interesting to note that one of the last Ojibwe-speaking
teachers at Lakeview School was let go by council this past
year. I sure hope Mr. Simon spoke up to keep this teacher in
view of his knowledge of Ojibwe language needs at the school at
the time.
The Custom
Election Code leads the way to Custom Governance which is a
broader and inherent authority and which can strengthen our
funding abilities.
Andrea McGraw
Former
Education Committee member
M'Chigeeng
First Nation
Harvesting info a 'draft' UOI stresses process is ongoing
To the
Expositor:
The Union of
Ontario Indians (UOI) and the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR)
have been engaged in the process of relationship-building for
several years with respect to the management of natural
resources in Ontario.
During this
time the UOI and the MNR established the Anishinabek/Ontario
Resource Management Council (AORMC) to assist with this process.
The AORMC is
supported by several working groups in the areas of water,
forestry, lands, enforcement and fisheries.
This letter
comes in response to an Expositor article published on April 13,
2005 ("First Nations and MNR collaborate on hunting initiative")
that included draft information from an AORMC Enforcement
Working Group document entitled "Anishinabek Harvesting in
Ontario."
The UOI wants
to emphasize that this information, which was clearly labelled
"draft," is not a legal document, and represents the product of
preliminary discussions with regards to harvesting rights and
responsibilities in Ontario. The AORMC Enforcement Working Group
is currently conducting information sessions to obtain feedback
and input from Anishinabek Nation communities represented by the
Union of Ontario Indians.
Endorsement
from all of our 42 member First Nations is essential to the
Union of Ontario Indians advancing these discussions, to enable
us to create a document with our provincial government partners
that is truly reflective of the issues and concerns of UOI
member First Nations.
The Resource
Management Council's goal is to improve resource management
relations between the Ministry of Natural Resources and the
Anishinabek Nation. It is hoped that the document created from
our discussions will educate all people of Ontario about
Anishinabek rights and reduce incidents of conflict that arise
over misunderstanding of these rights.
Allan Dokis
Director,
Intergovernmental Affairs
Union of
Ontario Indians
North Bay,
Ont.
|