|
Roman
Catholic community makes Manitoulin history St. Bernard's hosts
first
Island
ordination of a Catholic priest
LITTLE
CURRENT-On Saturday, June 23 and Sunday, June 24, a brand-new
Roman Catholic priest, Father George Gardner, processes to the
altars of two local churches: on Saturday to St. Bernard's
Catholic Church in Little Current and on Sunday to St. Gabriel
Lalement Church in Birch Island.
He conducts
the prayers and reponses, consecrates the bread and wine, and
then serves the sacrament of communion to members of his two new
flocks.
Just slightly
more than half a day before his 9:30 am mass at St. Bernard's,
he'd been a 70-year-old layman. And that transformation, and the
story that goes with it, is nearly miraculous in itself.
In Manitoulin
Island and Birch Island's nearly 400-year-long relationship with
the Roman Catholic Church, history is made late Friday afternoon
June 22 when George Gardner is ordained at St. Bernard's Church
in Little Current to the order of priest by Bishop Jean Louis
Plouffe and then is assigned "til death do us part" to minister
to the Little Current and Birch Island parishes as their parish
priest.
This is the
first-ever ordination of a priest on Manitoulin Island and over
300 people from all Island parishes and beyond crowd into St.
Bernard's Church to watch Bishop Plouffe and Father George make
history.
It is a
lengthy, bicultural, and multi-layered ceremony and everyone
with even a remote interest in the evolution of Catholicism on
Manitoulin wants to be part of the moment.
The service
begins at 5:30 pm, but as early as 4 pm, people begin arriving,
keen on finding a seat.
The church is
decorated with ceiling-to-floor banners coloured in the four
colours significant to the Anishnaabek people: the yellow and
red streamers, respectively, flank the altar. The black and
white streamers are at the rear of the sanctuary.
A tuneful male
chorus (the Knights of Columbus Chair) practises. They are
eventually joined by the St. Gabriel Lalement Choir from Birch
Island (all women but one lone man) who will present a series of
old hymns sung in the Ojibwe language.
It's 4:40 pm
and a group of priests plus George Gardner gather in front of
the steps leading to the altar. They confer, with Father Jim
Kelly (soon to be replaced as parish priest at St. Bernard's)
gesturing frequently as if to indicate a direction of entry or
who will stand where. They've had practice sessions. This is
last minute reminders and fine-tuning.
George
Gardner, the candidate for ordination, walks back up the main
aisle of the rapidly filling church around 4:50 pm, greeting and
welcoming friends and relatives along the way, and beaming in
his boyish way.
Donna Bruder
and Roseanne Debassige from M'Chigeeng walk through the church,
passing out tiny medicine bundles for parishioners, and George's
friends and relatives, to wear or hold, asking them to "pray for
George."
It's 5:15 pm,
and the combined Gabriel Lalement Choir and the Knights of
Columbus Choir sing an anthem together: 'How Great Thou Art,'
followed by the Birch Island Choir singing a traditional Ojibwe
hymn.
Anticipation
builds: at
5:25 pm, the church's historic bell, mounted on the outside wall
high above the altar area, begins to peal joyfully, focussing
everyone's attention.
And then at
5:30 pm, right on schedule, the ceremony begins with a
processional. It's led by acolyte
Beatrice Lake
who bears the cross. George Gardner is somewhere in the centre
of the procession, which includes an elder from Birch Island,
George Francis, no fewer than 23 priests, two Deacons (Dan
Larouche and Gilbert Pitawanakwat) and, finally, the most
Reverend Jean Louis Plouffe, the Bishop of the Diocese of Sault
Ste. Marie.
George
Francis, holding an eagle feather, is the first to speak and
talks quietly about the significance of the four coloured
banners that adorn the sanctuary.
Bishop Plouffe
acknowledges the capacity crowd in the church and states that
"it is a tribute to the people of Manitoulin Island and Birch
Island. Let us take time to ask God to prepare us for the
ordination of one of God's sons who has answered the call to be
a shepherd of God's people."
Deacon Gilbert
Pitawanakwat from Wikwemikong performs the smudging ritual, by
way of the penitential rite, purifying Bishop Plouffe and other
clergy and assistants behind the altar and then symbolically
smudging the congregation.
Gospel
readings are offered by Melanie (Morphet) Cortes from the St.
Bernard's parish and by Jean Andrews from St. Gabriel Lalement
parish.
Bishop Plouffe
moves to the front of the altar and George Gardner sits on a
chair provided for him at the foot of the altar steps. Bishop
Plouffe acknowledges George Gardner as "my brother George in the
presbytery" and then begins quiet instructions for the candidate
for ordination seated before him.
"I have two
lines to share with you," he says. "Be a priest for all and be a
man of God for all."
In his
teaching to the candidate for ordination, delivered one-on-one
to George Gardner and extemporaneously, he says that, "people
want this personal encounter with the Lord, and to believe in
Him, so that He is the focus of their lives."
"The function
of the priest is quite simply to bring God to the people. The
priest lives with God and for God," Bishop Plouffe instructs.
"Me and you
and all of us have to come to know God openly and personally.
You are a man for whom God is a friend; a man who shares the
feelings of Christ Himself."
"In the world
beyond Manitoulin, and maybe even on Manitoulin and Birch
Island, people are defined not as 'who are you?' but as 'what do
you do?!'"
"God must find
a home, be comfortable, inside us. It has to come from inside.
On your particular faith journey, George, people around you want
to hear your own personal experience with God. As
St. Augustine said, 'be a man of prayer before being a
preacher.'"
Bishop Plouffe
goes on to describe George Gardner's personal path: "In
Montreal (his hometown) you picked up a good part of one of the
main cultures in this country: French. You came to Sudbury and
you married in the Ukranian rite: another culture. You were, I
hear, a wonderful spouse, father and grandfather and soon to be
(to applause) a great-grandfather."
"Your job in
Sudbury and here in
Birch Island
taught you about another great culture in this country: First
Nations. You must have been a good listener because they made
you an honourary chief. That you could be one of them is another
way of being a priest for all, as is the art of sitting down and
resolving things which you know as a father."
"Your work at
Lafarge and, most recently your ministry (as a deacon) means
that you can easily be a priest for all." Bishop Plouffe
summarizes: "Married, a Lafarge manager, working with First
Nations. You're a priest."
"Be a priest
for all," he reiterates, reminding the candidate that "the one
who really helps us is Jesus. Remain open to Him and you will
never fail. Walk in the Christ-like way and build unity," he
concludes.
The rite of
ordination also includes the "calling of the candidate," through
which George Gardner, still not a priest, is asked to stand
before the altar steps. A priest, Father Mike Stogre (who had
been his primary advisor among the Jesuits) formally asks the
Bishop "to ordain this man, our brother, for service as priest."
"Do you judge
him as worthy?" is Bishop Plouffe's ritual response, and Father
Stogre responds, again in ritual form:_"After enquiring of the
people of Christ and upon recommendation with his training, I
testify that he has been found worthy."
("Enquiring of
the people of Christ," George Gardner has explained in an
earlier interview, is a serious matter as several dozen
parishioners who know him are sent a lengthy questionnaire about
the candidate's suitability.)
The Bishop
responds, "we choose this man, our brother, for priesthood in
the presbyteral (parish priest) order."
George Gardner
then stands before Bishop Plouffe, who questions him, asking him
if he is willing to work with the Bishop in "caring for God's
flock;" if he will "celebrate the mysteries of Christ faithfully
and religiously;" that he will "exercise the ministry of the
word faithfully and wisely;" and that he is "resolved to
consecrate your life to God for the salvation of his people, and
to unite yourself more closely every day to Christ the High
Priest, who offered himself for us to the Father as a perfect
sacrifice." To all of these questions, and to one that binds him
to promise "respect and obedience to me and my successors,"
George Gardner responds: "I do."
A
Native-patterned rug is spread on the church floor below the
altar steps and George Gardner lays prostrate on it, face down,
while Cantor Sally Marshall leads the congregation in the Litany
of the Saints, calling on those who have been elevated to
sainthood (by name), "all you holy men and women pray for us."
The Litany of
the Saints, interestingly, ends with the name of Kateri
Tekakwitha, one of only two Canadian-born candidates for
eventual sainthood. She was an Iroquoian woman from the
Montreal
area who, after conversion to Christianity in the 17th Century,
was killed by her own people because she would not renounce her
faith.
The laying on
of hands is a ritual and tradition nearly universal in Christian
churches when a new member of the clergy is elevated to that
status. It involves other members of the clergy, who have
themselves gone through the ritual, laying their hands on the
head of the candidate for the clergy. The tradition holds that
this binds the new clergyperson to a line of succession of
priests/ministers who have had hands laid on them by others, and
the others by others, going back through the centuries to St.
Peter who began the process 2,000 years ago.
In Friday's
ordination this is done in silence, as George Gardner kneels
before the altar, and is begun by Bishop Plouffe and
followed-each in his turn-by all 23 other ordained members of
the Catholic clergy present, all of whom then go to stand beside
and behind the altar in an impressive array.
Still
kneeling, the candidate is the object of a prayer of
consecration by Bishop Plouffe, who stands with his hands over
George Gardner's head, asking in part that God "grant to this
servant of yours the dignity of the priesthood. Renew within him
the spirit of holiness. As a co-worker with the order of
bishops, may he be faithful to the ministry that he receives
from you, Lord God, and be to others a model of right conduct."
The ritual
continues with the "vesting ceremony": George Gardner, with the
help of Violet McGregor and Leona Nahwegahbow, takes off his
cassock, and is helped by them into his new, priestly robes,
emblematic of his new status. Wearing the new robes, he kneels
before the Bishop who cleanses and anoints his hands, symbolic
of the fact that he will now be handling the bread and wine of
communion.
The bread and
the wine ("gifts") are brought to the altar by Violet McGregor
and Leona Nahwegahbow who pass them to Deacon Dan Larouche, who
in turn brings the elements of the mass to Bishop Plouffe-who
symbolically hands them on to the new priest, indicating that
they are now his to dispense. Bishop Plouffe says, "accept from
the holy people of God the gifts offered to Him. Know what you
are doing, and imitate the mystery you celebrate: model your
life on the mystery of the Lord's cross."
And finally,
Bishop Plouffe gives the kiss of peace to the new priest and
says, "peace be with you." Father George responds, "and also
with you."
Bishop Plouffe
then introduces "Father George" to a standing ovation, and tells
the congregation that the new priest will serve the Birch Island
and Little Current parishes.
Following the
ordination ceremony, an hour-and-a-half process, a reception
dinner is served at the Northeast Town Recreation Centre.
Father Jim
Kelly, until that afternoon the priest responsible for St.
Bernard's parish, as well as M'Chigeeng, Mindemoya, Gore Bay and
Sheshegwaning parishes, clarifies that he will continue to
minister exclusively to the rest of his Island parishes. Father
Kelly observes that while this was the first-ever ordination of
a priest on Manitoulin Island, it is perhaps not the last one,
indicating that Father George "sets a good example for more
vocations."
On behalf of
the St. Bernard's parish, Dan Leblanc welcomes his friend George
Gardner but notes that, "Father George: it's the institution.
From now on, you'll be Father George, Father Gardner. You'll be
everyone's father. Welcome to St. Bernard's."
Birch
Island
Elder Violet McGregor has had a long relationship with Father
George and she too welcomes him on behalf of the St. Gabriel
Lalement parish.
She recalls
that, when the Birch Island community chose to make George
Gardner an honourary chief several years ago because of his
close-working and caring relationship with the community when he
was the manager of the Lafarge cement terminal (that leases land
and a seaport on Birch Island), she and her husband Archie were
asked to be his godparents in the process of learning about the
culture. She intimates that her friend Father George was a good
student.
In his own
remarks, the new priest Father George thanks Bishop Plouffe: "he
has given me the opportunity, he's been patient and he's been
kind. There's no other like him."
Father George
is ardent in his praise for the priests of the Manitoulin and
Anderson Lake Jesuit community, naming each in turn and
recounting their particular assistance to him.
Father George,
thanking friends and family who had travelled significant
distances to be with him on this special day (and noting that
he'll soon have the privilege of baptizing his
great-grandchild), concludes that he is "looking forward to a
wonderful second career. God bless."
Bishop Plouffe
has the final word, referencing Father George's age at entering
the priesthood: 70.
He recalls
that on June 12, 1987, he attended an ordination of a priest in
Elliot Lake. That new priest was then 72.
"I'm going to
tell you," he says, "that on June 12 of this year, I went back
to Elliot Lake for a celebration of that priest's 20th
anniversary as a priest."
The caterers,
Kelly O'Hare and her staff from the Anchor Inn, receive not one
but two acknowledgements of a job well and efficiently done,
with an emphasis on the fact that the day before the event, the
venue had been of necessity changed to the Recreation Centre
from the original marquee tent which couldn't be pegged down in
the hard shale rock of the St. Bernard's church yard.
And on
Saturday morning, June 23, the next day, Father George presides
over his first celebration of mass at St. Bernard's church in
Little Current.
But lest there
be some concern about the future of the Jesuits on Manitoulin,
Father Bert Foliot took an opportunity at the close of Father
George's first mass to explain that, "Jesuits are 'sent'," (just
as he was sent from the Island to administer a retirement home
for Jesuit priests in Pickering).
"Father George
is not a Jesuit. He is a diocesan priest and he will not be
'sent' anywhere. He is here as the priest for these two parishes
until 'death do us part'."
"That doesn't
mean that the Jesuits are abandoning these parishes. We aren't
going anywhere. We will continue to support Father George."
For more
coverage of George Gardner's journey, see the Second Section
Front.
Brent Kells
gets 10-year sentence for manslaughter
by Margo
Little
GORE
BAY-Spectators wept openly in Gore Bay Superior Court last
Wednesday as a Zhiibaahaasing First Nation man was sentenced to
10 years in a federal penitentiary.
Families and
community members had gathered to learn the results of extensive
plea bargaining conducted by the defence and the Crown.
Brent Jeremy
Kells, 23, pled guilty to manslaughter before Justice Robert
DelFrate on June 20. Originally, he had been charged with
first-degree murder after his arrest on November 27, 2005. He
had been taken into custody by the United Chiefs and Councils of
Manitoulin (UCCM) tribal police after the body of his common-law
partner, Maryann Davis, was discovered at 340 Sagon Road in
Zhiibaahaasing. The mother of two had been killed by a single
gunshot wound to the right eye.
The matter did
not reach a preliminary inquiry stage until November 14, 2006.
During the four-day hearing, defence attorney James Weppler
urged the judge to make a distinction between first-degree and
second-degree murder. He pointed out that first-degree murder
involves calculated planning and deliberation. He argued that
the evidence presented did not support the capital murder
charge.
However,
Justice Louise Serre ruled on November 29, 2006 that Mr. Kells
would be committed to stand trial on the first-degree murder
charge. Since that time the defence and the Crown have been
involved in a plea bargaining process.
Last Wednesday
the results of these negotiations were revealed in public. A
joint submission was heard by presiding Justice DelFrate.
Although he agreed to weigh the joint submission carefully, he
reminded court that he was not bound by the negotiations if he
felt they were inappropriate in the circumstances.
The first
order of business was to withdraw an obstruction of justice
charge against Robert Kells, father of the accused. As part of
the plea bargain, the Crown dropped the charge, noting the
evidence was weak in that matter.
Then Mr.
Weppler, lawyer for Brent Kells, asked Justice DelFrate to
examine what is known as a "Gladue Report" prepared by the UCCM
justice project before sentencing. He asked the court to show
compassion for his client's life experiences.
Gladue reports
take their name from a Supreme Court of Canada decision (R v.
Gladue) delivered on April 23, 1999. The decision set out the
parameters of section 718.2 (e) of the Criminal Code regarding
the sentencing of offenders, in particular Aboriginal offenders.
The Gladue decision requires sentencing judges to consider all
available sanctions other than imprisonment and to pay
particular attention to the circumstances of Aboriginal
offenders. In Toronto, for example, three "Gladue courts" have
been established with several caseworkers hired to prepare
reports for defence counsel, the Crown and the judges. In the
documents, the background of the Aboriginal offender is detailed
and recommendations are made for courts to consider. Since 1999,
Gladue principles are supposed to be engaged whenever a
decision-maker is dealing with the liberty of an Aboriginal
person at any stage of the justice system.
The Gladue
report prepared for Mr. Kells has been withheld as it contains
confidential medical information.
The Crown,
represented by Lorraine Ottley, reminded the court that Gladue
principles do not apply when the crime is of a particularly
serious nature. In cases where the offence is extremely violent,
the sentence will probably be similar to that accorded to
non-Aboriginal offenders.
In summarizing
the defence's position, Mr. Weppler characterized the shooting
of Maryann Davis as a terrible accident. "This is about a
tragedy in which a warm, loving and intelligent young woman
tragically died," he said.
And he
stressed the death had also been a tragedy for his client since
Mr. Kells had lost "his life companion and the mother of his
son." He acknowledged that the death had been caused by
negligence but emphasized that his client did not commit murder.
"He did not intend to kill Maryann Davis," he reiterated.
Mr. Weppler
offered Justice DelFrate witness impressions of the relationship
between Mr. Kells and Ms. Davis. He conceded that both young
people faced serious obstacles; however, he argued that the
situation was improving just before the shooting.
"The horrible
irony is that this incident happened just when their lives were
getting better," he said. "The people in Zhiibaahaasing had been
impressed that the couple was doing well. Maryann had become
part of the community. And everyone was devastated by her
death."
Mr. Weppler
told the court that his client knows the death was caused by his
negligence and that he is willing to take responsibility for
causing the death.
He asked
Justice DelFrate to impose a 10-year prison sentence with no
credit for time served since the date of his arrest. A lifetime
ban on firearms possession was also part of the joint request.
In addition,
he recommended that Mr. Kells attend a Native residential
treatment centre and have access to Aboriginal healing services.
"Brent is
aware that this is only the beginning of a long journey ahead,"
he added. "He has taken responsibility and will try to do
something good with his life."
Certain facts
are known about the night of the 911 call, the Crown said. Mr.
Kells told police he had been holding a .22-calibre rifle when
it discharged and shot Ms. Davis. He admitted that he had raised
the gun, looked through the sight and pointed it at her head.
However, he indicated that he did not know the gun was loaded
and that he had not put any shell into the gun. The clip of .22
cartridges was lying on top of the refrigerator at the time. A
forensic firearms expert had reported that the gun was not a
hair trigger; it would take 4.5 pounds of pressure for the
firearm to be discharged. The accused stated that he thought the
safety was on and that nothing would happen anyway. To his shock
and dismay, the .22 rifle went off and shot Ms. Davis, the joint
statement said.
The defence
had argued at the preliminary hearing that the accused did not
know there was a cartridge in the gun when he pulled the
trigger. In addition, witnesses reported that the gun was
defective and extensively damaged.
Ms. Ottley
urged the judge to weigh the accused's prior criminal record and
the facts of a previous conviction in the sentencing decision.
She pointed out that Mr. Kells had been convicted on November
10, 2003 of assault with a weapon against Maryann Davis while he
was on probation. He pled guilty and admitted that he had argued
with her, called her names, yelled at her, grabbed her, threw
her on the bed and choked her. Then he picked up a crow bar,
smacked it down on a desk and said "if you do not move, I'm not
going to put it through your head." When Maryann moved, he swung
the crow bar at her and just missed her head. He then punched
her in the face. Mr. Kells said he was going to kill himself and
grabbed a knife and started swinging it around wildly. Maryann
and another witness wrestled with him to get the knife away as
they were trying to prevent him from harming himself.
The agreed
statement of facts also states that the accused was on a
recognizance of bail which prohibited him from having any
contact with Ms. Davis. He had also been ordered to abstain from
drinking and from possession of any firearms. A 10 pm curfew was
also in effect at his parents' residence.
The Crown
emphasized that Mr. Kells was prohibited from owning a firearm
at the time of the shooting as a result of the previous
conviction for assault with a weapon on Ms. Davis.
"This sheds
light on the shooting incident and his explanation of it," Ms.
Ottley said. "There were remarkably similar intentions in both
incidents (the crow bar and the shooting). With the crow bar, he
seems to have been trying to frighten and terrorize her with the
crow bar."
According to
the Crown, it is important for sentences to "deter others from
using weapons against spouses in cases of domestic violence."
She
acknowledged that domestic violence is as prevalent in this
jurisdiction as it is in any other jurisdiction in Canada. "It's
a scourge on society," she said. "And it sometimes culminates in
the death of a spouse. These people have to be deterred from
using weapons that can result in very tragic events."
To illustrate
the nature of the five-year relationship between the accused and
the victim, the Crown also introduced excerpts from a computer
diary kept by Ms. Davis. In her journal, she detailed her
struggle to cope with her mate's "lies, jealousy and abuse."
Although she knew she should leave the situation, she felt she
could help her partner overcome his problems.
"I do truly
love him, but I fear for him," she wrote. In her view, he was at
a "crossroads" and would have to find a way to deal with his
anger and trust issues. Again and again she prayed for "a chance
to live my life freely, away from all this pain."
Despite the
anguish and confusion apparent in the written pages, she was
looking ahead to a positive future. Her diary documents her
hopes, dreams and her aspiration to "help those unfortunate
people who have lives like mine."
Victim impact
statements from the
Davis
family were also presented.
At the
completion of the joint submission, Justice DelFrate offered Mr.
Kells a moment to address the court. Wiping away tears and
clutching an eagle feather, the accused expressed remorse and
asked the Davis family for forgiveness. "I'm so sorry; there are
no words for what I'm feeling. I wish it was me."
After the
statements, Justice DelFrate summarized the purpose of
sentencing in the Canadian system. A sentence is meant to ensure
a just and safe society and to denounce unlawful conduct, he
noted. It is also intended to deter offenders and separate them
from society, but it should also offer rehabilitation and repair
of harm to victims and the community.
Mr. Kells was
sentenced to 10 years of incarceration on top of time served. A
lifetime ban on firearms possession was imposed.
The judge
accepted the defence's contention that Mr. Kells had experienced
serious difficulties in the medical, educational and emotional
aspects of his life. He also recognized that therapeutic
resources were not as available as they should be on Manitoulin.
"You will
still be a young man when you get out," he advised Mr. Kells. "I
strongly recommend that you take whatever treatment is offered
and make strides in your recovery or else it's just a matter of
time before you are back in court and back in jail."
He extended
his sympathy to the families for the loss of Ms. Davis. "She was
a special person, deeply loved and admired," he said.
And he urged
them to emulate the "love and forgiveness shown by Maryann" in
her life.
After the
sentencing, the
Davis
family issued a statement through Maryann's uncle, Merdick
McFarlane: "First and foremost in our minds is that this
terrible tragedy has no end or resolve that allows this matter
ever to come to a close. Our family has lost a beautiful young
person who was a daughter, a mother, a granddaughter or a niece
to us. Her death leaves a void in each and every one of our
hearts, a hole that may never fill, and yet we also come to the
realization that the Kells too have felt our pain, and have wept
tears of grief over the loss of Maryann, a girl who lived on
their First Nations."
"We
acknowledge," the statement continues, "that in this type of
circumstance, all either party of this terrible tragedy can do
is rely on the court system to resolve the issues related to
Maryann's death and come to some type of sentence that is seen
to fit the circumstances. The crown attorney's office's decision
to plea bargain is probably well within the crown's right to do
so, but most family members are left with a sense of betrayal
and perhaps a bit of mistrust in the judicial system at being
left in the dark as to the arrangements made. We hope that
future letters to the crown attorney's office will shed some
light on the process so that we may understand how this sentence
was arrived at."
The Davis
family wishes "to thank the investigating officers for their
support and kindness to the parents and family of Maryann Davis
and to the many people who supported the trust fund set up by
the Community of Christ Church on behalf of Maryann's daughter,"
the statement adds. "The release of information on the
sentencing of Brent Kells brings to a close another chapter in
the death of Maryann; however, her story should never be
forgotten nor go untold as the years pass. To do so would be
like admitting that her life and the lives of other victims of
this type of violence are meaningless in our society. Perhaps
some day her story will be told in hopes of ending the cycle of
violence against women."
The case has
also been followed closely by the board and staff at Manitoulin
Family Resources (MFR) and Haven House Shelter. This week they
issued a prepared statement voicing solidarity with the Davis
family and all the families who are affected by violence against
women.
As expressed
in a letter to the Expositor, MFR directors said: "While we
appreciate that consideration was given to the history of
domestic violence in this relationship, we do not share the
opinion of the Crown Attorney that manslaughter was the
appropriate result in this case. We agree that a sentence of ten
years is significant; however, the representatives in
Manitoulin's justice system need to be willing to dig in, work
hard and fight for the true experience of the women and children
who are the victims of woman abuse. When women in our community
are seriously injured or killed, it is dangerous to let these
incidents be known as accidents, because it reinforces the
attitude that woman abuse is not a significant problem here.
There are sometimes more important principles than the sentence
attached to a crime."
The Crown
stands by the outcome of the plea bargain. According to Ms.
Ottley, "the sentence imposed is approaching the maximum of
sentences normally imposed for manslaughter convictions. And
there was substantial risk if the matter proceeded to trial that
the sentence would have been much lower."
She indicated
that in many cases manslaughter convictions are often two or
three years or less.
The opinion of
Justice John Poupore, chief administrator for the region, was
sought during the negotiations, she noted. And he was convinced
that manslaughter is the appropriate conviction in this case.
The Crown also consulted with senior police officers, senior
crown counsel and the mother of the deceased. Again, the
consensus was that a manslaughter conviction was appropriate,
according to Ms. Ottley.
Friday's 'Day
of Action' focuses on swing bridge, ferry
MANITOULIN-Demonstrations and possible blockades are anticipated
across Canada this Friday as Aboriginals protest the sluggish
pace of land claims settlements and the high rate of First
Nations poverty, but the expectation is that holiday traffic
won't be appreciably affected on Manitoulin.
A memorandum
circulated by the United Chiefs and Councils of Manitoulin (UCCM)
indicates that a rally will be held at the swing bridge from 10
am to 1 pm on Friday, but "there is no desire to block traffic
or otherwise create animosity with the non-Native population and
risk losing support."
While the
rally isn't meant to be confrontational or disruptive, a strong
message is still meant to be communicated. "We hope that by
demonstrating together we can show our neighbours that there are
serious outstanding issues that their governments should be
settling, fairly, with us," the UCCM message notes.
The Assembly
of First Nations (AFN) is calling for Natives across Canada to
take to the streets for peaceful demonstrations as part of what
is being called a National Day of Action. AFN Chief Phil
Fontaine will be participating in a rally in the nation's
capital, with several unions, including the CAW, having pledged
to show solidarity by marching alongside the Native leader.
One First
Nation in
Manitoba
had earlier vowed to halt rail traffic, but has since decided to
call off the blockade, in large part because Indian Affairs
Minister Jim Prentice was able to defuse the threat through a
hastily arranged land settlement.
Manitoulin
would be particularly vulnerable to any protest that cut off
access via either the swing bridge or the Chi-Cheemaun ferry,
and officials with both the Ministry of Transportation (MTO) and
the Owen Sound Transportation Company (OSTC) are bracing for the
possibility of a disruption. But the hope is that there won't be
any delays for travellers.
"At this point
we've heard nothing more than rumours," said Ian Dean of the
OSTC. "There's nothing substantial that we know of, so we're
treating is as business as usual."
M'Chigeeng
councillor and activist Forry Hare said that while the
Manitoulin rally should be a peaceful one, he couldn't speak for
what might happen elsewhere. "I haven't heard too much from my
friends down south, but I'm sure there's something in the mix,"
he said. "It's hard to predict. It might not be on the Island,
but that's all I can say about that."
Mr. Dean said
that Highway 6 south of Tobermory was blocked by protestors on
one occasion in the 1980s. "It meant that people had to detour
around on a side road, and the ferry was delayed for 20
minutes," he said.
In this case,
he isn't sure what to expect. "We can't really prepare until we
know what's happening," he said.
The Friday of
the Canada Day long weekend is typically one of the busiest
times for the Chi-Cheemaun, and despite the potential for an
interruption in the schedule, "bookings are certainly on par
with previous years," said Mr. Dean.
EDITORIAL
More should have been done to prevent tragic death
The plea
bargaining is over and Judge Robert DelFrate has sentenced Brent
Kells to 10 years in a federal penitentiary on a conviction of
manslaughter in the shooting death of his common-law spouse
Maryann Davis 18 months ago.
Naturally,
there is concern with a conviction of manslaughter when the
young woman died from a gunshot wound after the accused pointed
a rifle at her head and pulled the trigger.
But the "I
didn't know it was loaded" defence has been used successfully
before and doubtless will be successful again in cases of this
nature.
What is just
as distressing, though, are the court-ordered circumstances that
ironically allowed the star-crossed couple to come together to a
tragic conclusion, at exactly the time when they should have
been kept far, far apart from one another.
Zhiibaahaasing
First Nation is a small community both geographically and, in
spite of Stats Canada's recent finding of a 52.9 percent
population increase, in numbers as well: there were, in 2006, a
total of 56 community residents.
And by the
very nature of this new First Nations community, virtually all
of the homes and community buildings are located quite close
together.
Mr. Kells had
a history of trying to inflict violence on Ms. Davis. That's
part of the record.
At the time of
her death, Mr. Kells was free from jail from this prior assault
charge but on a bail condition that prohibited him from having
any contact with Ms. Davis, together with other conditions
concerning his possession of firearms and use of alcohol.
But the fact
is that, in this tiny, postage-stamp sized community, he was
allowed to roam about (ostensibly under his parents' watchful
eyes) until 10 pm in the evening.
The thing is,
Maryann Davis also lived in this same tiny, postage-stamp sized
community and the reason Mr. Kells was out on bail was because
he had broken the previous terms of the probation imposed on him
after an assault conviction against the same young woman two
years earlier.
So there he
is: convicted of a (by all accounts potentially deadly) assault
charge and allowed to remain in the same tiny, postage-stamp
sized community as the woman he'd assaulted.
But he was
ordered not to have any contact with her.
What a joke.
With all
respect, the tragedy that took Ms. Davis' life and has, in all
probability, ruined not only Mr. Kells' life but the lives of
Ms. Davis' two children, might well have been prevented had the
court either imprisoned him at the time of the first (or second)
offence or, at the very least, required that he live in another
community, off Manitoulin Island but with supervision.
In
Zhiibaahaasing, and in small villages similar to it, it's
virtually impossible to not see and run into virtually everyone
who lives there on a fairly frequent, if not daily, basis.
A defence
lawyer and/or social worker who argued in favour of allowing Mr.
Kells, who had amply demonstrated his ability to be violent, to
remain in the same small community as Ms. Davis has much to
answer for.
In a perfect
world, people like Mr. Kells and Ms. Davis would have gone out
of their ways to avoid contact.
But it had
already been demonstrated to a fault that theirs was not a
perfect world and that at least Mr. Kells desperately needed, as
a minimum requirement, some imposed common sense.
Instead,
common sense was ignored by the very agencies that should
protect people like Mr. Kells and Ms. Davis, not only from one
another but perhaps more importantly from their own inclination
to make bad judgments.
In this case,
back whenever the bail terms were imposed on Mr. Kells, he had
repeatedly demonstrated his ability to behave recklessly at Ms.
Davis' expense. That he did so at least one more time with such
tragic results reaches far beyond irony.
He should not
have been allowed to remain in the same tiny community where she
also lived, and any agencies dealing with similar small-town
situations like this in the future must be mindful to err
mightily on the side of caution and not on the side of "hoping
for the best."
LETTERS TO THE
EDITOR
Story and headline about lawsuit deemed innacurate
Former chief Walter Manitowabi is owed an apology
To the
Expositor:
The article
dealing with the Drew Reid lawsuit in last week's Expositor
("Wikwemikong band, Wiky police force, former chief face lawsuit
brought by ex-FirstTel boss," June 20) is misinformative to say
the least. Misinformative with respect to the part referencing a
"former chief." Current Chief Robert Corbiere's predecessor is
Walter Manitowabi, and this issue has no relevance to Mr.
Manitowabi. This young man has a business which could be
severely impacted upon by the Expositor's inaccurate headline.
As a band
member of this reserve I am more than a little tired of the
Expositor's inaccuracies when it comes to Native news. The
writer of the article ought to have checked out the facts prior
to printing. It is also incumbent upon the editor of the
newspaper to ensure the articles are accurate and fair. Just as
there is always the contingent liability aspect in situations,
so too in the reporting of news.
As an
institution receiving accolades in the world of journalism, one
glaring mistake or oversight diminishes the significance of that
institution's progress.
It is my
feeling, and likely others, that Mr. Manitowabi is owed a
sincere apology.
Eugene
Manitowabi
Wikwemikong
EDITOR'S
RESPONSE: In citing a "former chief" in our headline, we were
referring to Gladys Wakegijig, one of three council members who
are clearly named in the second paragraph of the story (none of
those names being Walter Manitowabi) as targets of a recently
filed lawsuit. While Ms. Wakegijig may not be the present
chief's immediate predecessor, she is certainly a former chief,
having served in this capacity from 2001 to 2002. (So, for that
matter, is the letter writer himself, who held the post of chief
immediately prior to Ms. Wakegijig.) The story makes no
reference to ex-chief Walter Manitowabi, and the headline was in
no way intended to implicate him in the legal matter described
therein. If some readers made that association, we regret the
confusion, but stand by our reporting on the subject and the
accuracy of our headline.
Outcome of Kells case minimizes severity of the crime
What message does this send to our community?
To the
Expositor:
When will
woman abuse be taken seriously? In November, 2006, a lengthy
preliminary hearing resulted in Brent Jeremy Kells being
committed to stand trial on the charge of first-degree murder in
the shooting death of Maryann Davis. Last Wednesday, a plea of
guilt was entered on joint submission between the crown and
defence to the lesser charge of manslaughter. The difference
between these charges is the matter of intent; the crown
attorney and the presiding judge have accepted that the events
of November 26, 2005 were accidental in nature. In recognition
of the history of domestic violence, a significant sentence of
10 years in addition to time served was imposed. Is a
significant sentence more important than attempting to prove a
woman was murdered? What message does this send to our
community?
At the time of
the killing, a recognizance of bail was in place with regard to
Brent Kells; he was to appear in court the next week on previous
charges of assault against Maryann Davis. That recognizance
stipulated that he was not to have contact with the victim, not
to consume alcohol, and not to have in his possession any
firearm. He was to be residing at the home of his parents, with
a curfew of 10 pm. These conditions were put in place by the
court in order to keep Maryann safe. On the night in question,
every one of these conditions was violated, and together
culminated in Maryann's death. Why are we not to question that
this was an accident?
In the
statement of agreed-upon facts, the crown referred to a history
of "minor assaults," which included threats of self-harm and
intimidation with a weapon. In the context of escalating
violence, it would be expected that use of weapons would follow;
it is unreasonable to conclude that the use of the weapons would
be limited to threatening and posturing. In addition, testimony
given by witnesses at the preliminary hearing was referred to,
which identified that Brent and Maryann seemed to be getting
along that evening, and that the relationship seemed to be
taking a positive turn. Unfortunately, we know that the
"positive turns" in a violent relationship are cyclical and
volatile. It should never be assumed that the violence won't
return, or that the danger isn't constantly present.
Also referred
to was an excerpt from Maryann's computer diary, which showed
her selfless and forgiving nature. It acknowledged not only the
difficult experience of her life, but also her hopes for a
better future with her partner if only he would change his
behaviour. This was considered by the court to show her
generosity of spirit; unfortunately, it also showed that, as
with many victims of domestic violence, her own needs were
regularly subjugated in deference to meeting the needs of her
partner. We, as a community, need to advocate for the needs and
importance of women who continue to live with violence. When
they are killed, we need to be willing to question the
circumstances and fight for appropriate convictions, not
participate in the minimization or denial of reality: woman
abuse is an escalating and potentially lethal pattern of
behaviour. The judicial process needs to reflect the seriousness
of this issue in our own communities.
On behalf of
the board and staff at Manitoulin Family Resources and Haven
House shelter, we would like to express our compassion and
solidarity with the family of Maryann Davis, and all families
who are affected by violence against women. We would also like
to extend our sincere thanks to the UCCM police services for
their commitment and dedication to the investigation of this
case.
Heather Thoma
president,
board of directors
Manitoulin
Family Resources/Haven House shelter
Reader questions point about return of Ipperwash Park
There has been no decision to date
To the
Expositor:
I disagree
with the statement in the fourth paragraph of the editorial in
the Manitoulin Expositor of June 6 ("History of Ipperwash affair
shows tragedy was avoidable"). In it, you state that Justice
Linden has recommended that "Ipperwash
Provincial
Park
should also be returned to the band." I think this is incorrect.
Premier McGuinty, speaking at a press conference, made some
reference to the park being given to the band, but there has
been no decision to date.
Gordon Redston
Toronto
EDITOR'S NOTE:
One of the Ipperwash Inquiry's recommendations is that "the
federal government should immediately return the former Camp
Ipperwash army base to the Kettle and Stony Point First Nation."

Donna Osterkruger
Central Pharmacy
Gore
Bay
I'm your neighbour
Central
Pharmacy in
Gore
Bay
provides the perfect job setting for Donna Osterkruger, who has
been employed there for about 10 years.
"I really
enjoy working with the people here, and the customers," she
says. "I tried working for another local company, but I only
stayed there three days because I wasn't dealing with people,
which is something I really enjoy."
Ms.
Osterkruger's position at Central Pharmacy is certainly varied.
"I do a little bit of everything: working at the cash, helping
Kidane (Gebrekristose, the owner of the business), cleaning,
stocking shelves, invoicing on the computer, and
ordering-everything except filling prescriptions."
"There is
never a dull moment around here," she adds. "There is always
something to do, or someone to enjoy a laugh with. I don't know
how many times Kidane has had me in tears laughing from some
joke or silly thing going on at the store."
Mr.
Gebrekristose opened Central Pharmacy 21 years ago, and the
store has expanded its services extensively over that period of
time. Central Pharmacy provides customers with prescription drug
services, computer and office supplies, Internet services,
photocopying, magazines and novels, and a picture maker.
"Everybody
gets along so well here," says Ms. Osterkruger. "And yes, one of
the best parts of the job is seeing the customers on a regular
basis, or meeting new customers. We have one regular customer
who comes in every Thursday and asks for Smoky, which is what he
calls me. It is people like that who make it enjoyable to go to
work every day."
"I certainly
enjoy my job," Ms. Osterkruger says. "I'd be lost if they ever
fired me."
|